On 22/08/13 15:21, Hilton Gibson wrote:
Just thinking, would it have been too much trouble to trademark a new name
and then carry on as usual?
This was discussed around
http://koha.1045719.n5.nabble.com/Foundation-conversation-td3213032i30.html#message3215936
On 22 August 2013 19:04, Hilton Gibson hilton.gib...@gmail.com wrote:
What if you want to deviate from what the packages installation does?
In the open source world, it has been my experience that a tarball
installation is always preferred, since it allows you install anywhere, not
just
Just my unsolicited commentary on the provision of a really bad set of
instructions on how to set Koha up.
Oops?
___
Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
Hi Magnus
This depends, do you intend to have an original tarball installation wiki
page?
If so, will there be one for each stable version of Koha and a version for
each upgrade?
Cheers
hg
On 22 August 2013 09:42, Magnus Enger mag...@enger.priv.no wrote:
On 22 August 2013 09:04, Hilton
On 22 August 2013 10:15, Hilton Gibson hilton.gib...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Magnus
This depends, do you intend to have an original tarball installation wiki
page?
If so, will there be one for each stable version of Koha and a version for
each upgrade?
All of this depends on who wants to
Greetings,
There are tarball instructions on the Wiki for Ubuntu already.
However, in an effort to get people to not go backwards, I am not providing
the link.
http://wiki.koha-community.org/ is where the Koha wiki is.
As Chris has pointed out, upgrading is so much easier with packages. This
Yes. Koha is a word, not an acronym. This is why KOHA is wrong, unless you
are attempting to shout the awesomeness of it. ;)
Nope - it is just best practice to ensure that users know of the product.
By the way - why is there a koha-community and a koha out there.
Very confusing.
On 22
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:04 AM, Hilton Gibson hilton.gib...@gmail.com
wrote:
What if you want to deviate from what the packages installation does?
In the open source world, it has been my experience that a tarball
installation is always preferred, since it allows you install anywhere,
not
Hilton Gibson schrieb am 22.08.2013
Yes. Koha is a word, not an acronym. This is why KOHA is wrong, unless you
are attempting to shout the awesomeness of it. ;)
Nope - it is just best practice to ensure that users know of the product.
Wrong, because…
By the way - why is there a
Hi to all those who have replied and apologies for cross-posting.
Please see: http://bit.ly/goodir
That documentation is being actively used to install and setup DSpace world
wide.
The DSpace developers have official documentation and there is no
animosity about anybody else having documentation
Greetings,
As of Koha 3.4.x debian packages were available. That's just over 2 years
ago. Koha has progressed so much further. Tarballs are not the recommended
installation method for debian-based versions of linux (e.g. Ubuntu). Much
nicer and more current installation instructions are
11 matches
Mail list logo
