Le 06/06/2011 20:57, Chris Cormack a écrit :
> On 7 June 2011 06:53, Linda Culberson wrote:
>> The problem, at least in 3.4, does exist, but changing the query from
>> sn,wrdl to sn,phr and bc,wrdl to bc,phr seems to fix it.
>>
>> But I'm still wondering if there are others - besides call numbers
On 7 June 2011 06:53, Linda Culberson wrote:
> The problem, at least in 3.4, does exist, but changing the query from
> sn,wrdl to sn,phr and bc,wrdl to bc,phr seems to fix it.
>
> But I'm still wondering if there are others - besides call numbers -
> for which this applies.
>
> I apologize for the
The problem, at least in 3.4, does exist, but changing the query from
sn,wrdl to sn,phr and bc,wrdl to bc,phr seems to fix it.
But I'm still wondering if there are others - besides call numbers -
for which this applies.
I apologize for the multiple emails. I should do more research before I
e
3 matches
Mail list logo