On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Nicholas van Rheede van Oudtshoorn <
vano...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry if this is a silly question, but what does it mean for those who have
> been upgrading? Do the RDA fields get updated in our frameworks?
>
>
I'm not sure.
From which version are you upgrading?
I
Sorry if this is a silly question, but what does it mean for those who have
been upgrading? Do the RDA fields get updated in our frameworks?
Nick
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Katrin Fischer
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> in newer versions of Koha the RDA fields are included in the default
> framework
Hi all,
in newer versions of Koha the RDA fields are included in the default
framework already.- So it might be worth checking your default framework
first before importing the RDA framework from the wiki.
Hope this helps,
Katrin
Am 10.07.2015 um 16:48 schrieb Jesse Lambertson:
> Hello and Ha
Hello and Happy Friday!
I saw this link to the RDA Framework in a different thread (converting
marc21 from aacr2 to rda)
I was looking over the frameworks in my Koha instance and it seems I added
a new RDA framework to KOHA - or am I confused? *Framework: RDA /
Description: RDA Framework*.
Do I
Hi, Jenice--
I don't know how many there are, but we've been using RDA for our new
records for a while now in Koha, for our library and archival materials. I
have a list with some different types of materials, including archival
finding aids, cataloging according to RDA if you'd like to take a lo
Hello,
here in Czech Republic RDA will come on 1st. april, so we just staretd
start pre-implemetation steps. If here some library that RDA already use,
can we share info about it?
Thanks
Mike
2015-02-17 19:32 GMT+01:00 Jenice S. Tate :
> Does anyone know how many libraries that use Koha have im
Does anyone know how many libraries that use Koha have implemented RDA
for cataloging purposes and how many of them are archives?
--
Jenice S. Tate, Lead Systems Administrator
MS Department of Archives & History
Archives & Records Services Division - Computer Support
Phone: (601) 576-6821
Fax:
Hi all,
I understand that new Koha installations includes the RDA tags and
subfields in the MARC21 frameworks.
However on looking at the Zebra search configuration (in package install
in /etc/koha/zebradb/marc_defs/marc21/biblios/record.abs and biblio*) I
cannot see any reference to tag 264
At 05:41 PM 10/7/2013 +0100, Elaine Bradtke wrote:
[snip]
We're not implementing it because we can't afford a subscription to
the documentation to even see if it will work for us.
Agreed -- it's not in my budget either. $355 to find out what? A committee
changes its mind, another $355 ...
My
hey get reimported as the
> default framework.
>
> __
> Cecil Hillyard
> Washoe County Library
> Reno, Nevada
>
> -Original Message-
> From: koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz
> [mailto:koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz] On Behalf Of Ramon Andiñach
> Sent: We
Behalf Of Ramon Andiñach
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 3:45 PM
To: koha mailing list
Subject: [Koha] RDA questions WAS: Re: Flippin' Yanks
Non-professional here, so apologies if these are dumb questions. I'm happy to
be pointed at links in the right direction.
If I'm understanding
At 12:05 PM 10/3/2013 +1300, Chris Cormack wrote:
* Ramon Andiñach (cust...@westnet.com.au) wrote:
[snip]
Basically I am not a fan of RDA in the slightest, I think it is
holding libraries back, not moving them forward.
+1 emphatically
People are bound to disagree with me, and that's the gre
* Ramon Andiñach (cust...@westnet.com.au) wrote:
> Non-professional here, so apologies if these are dumb questions. I'm happy to
> be pointed at links in the right direction.
>
> If I'm understanding correctly, RDA itself is akin to AACR2 in that it
> contains lists of acceptable terms and how t
Non-professional here, so apologies if these are dumb questions. I'm happy to
be pointed at links in the right direction.
If I'm understanding correctly, RDA itself is akin to AACR2 in that it contains
lists of acceptable terms and how to use them; but different in that it's built
on a differen
ris Meech
To: "koha@lists.katipo.co.nz"
Subject: [Koha] RDA framework
Message-ID:
<988cfbf8ca18774a819d6157bacb27f90736585...@wdcex1.waitakidc.govt.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
The Koha RDA framework here
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/MARC_
ssage-
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:26:29 +1200
From: Chris Meech
To: "koha@lists.katipo.co.nz"
Subject: [Koha] RDA framework
Message-ID:
<988cfbf8ca18774a819d6157bacb27f90736585...@wdcex1.waitakidc.govt.nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
The
On 29 August 2013 13:26, Chris Meech wrote:
> Hi,
> The Koha RDA framework here
> http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/MARC_frameworks#RDA_Framework
> seems to be lacking a 264 field.
>
> Has anyone got an RDA framework that includes 264?
>
We could have pretty fast,
If you
Hi,
The Koha RDA framework here
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/MARC_frameworks#RDA_Framework
seems to be lacking a 264 field.
Has anyone got an RDA framework that includes 264?
Cheers
Chris
Christopher Meech
Reference and Heritage Librarian
Waitaki District Libraries
P.O. Box 134,Oamaru
oun...@lists.katipo.co.nz
> [mailto:koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz] On Behalf Of Chris Cormack
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 1:59 PM
> To: Sandra Busutel
> Cc: koha-user
> Subject: Re: [Koha] RDA changes to biblio
>
> On 19 March 2013 09:54, Sandra Busutel wrote:
> > Hi
> >
&
PM
To: Sandra Busutel
Cc: koha-user
Subject: Re: [Koha] RDA changes to biblio
On 19 March 2013 09:54, Sandra Busutel wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had a look in the default section for Marc field but the areas
> needed for RDA are not there i.e. 264, 336, 337, 338, 347. Is this
> coming in
On 19 March 2013 09:54, Sandra Busutel wrote:
> Hi
>
> I had a look in the default section for Marc field but the areas needed for
> RDA are not there i.e. 264, 336, 337, 338, 347. Is this coming in an upload
> or is it hidden and we just need instructions in order to reveal it or do
> we have to
Hi
I had a look in the default section for Marc field but the areas needed for
RDA are not there i.e. 264, 336, 337, 338, 347. Is this coming in an upload
or is it hidden and we just need instructions in order to reveal it or do
we have to create them? SCIS our Marc21 provider is moving to impleme
On 12 May 2012 10:15, Hillyard, Cecil wrote:
> What happens if I start getting records with these fields in them from our
> bibliographic provider (because I can). They are just there right as long as
> they are in the frameworks? And can be hidden from the OPAC. If they need to
> be edited w
: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
Subject: Re: [Koha] RDA fields 336, 337, 338
Salvete!
>T he working Group of spanish Koha-Kobli community
>(http://kobli.bage.es) is finishing to bring up to date the default
>framework to the last update of MARC21, the 14 (April 2012), we will send it
On 12 May 2012 10:04, BWS Johnson wrote:
> Salvete!
>
>
>>> Excepting that they haven't. This was sent out to the GOVDOCS
>> listserv.
>>>
>> Except that they have
>>
>> http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/news/framework-103111.html
>>
>
>
> That's from October. This is from today.
>
> htt
Salvete!
>> Excepting that they haven't. This was sent out to the GOVDOCS
> listserv.
>>
> Except that they have
>
> http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/news/framework-103111.html
>
That's from October. This is from today.
http://lists.psu.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1205B&L=GOVDOC-L&T=0&
On 12 May 2012 09:09, BWS Johnson wrote:
> Salvete!
>
>
>>T he working Group of spanish Koha-Kobli community (http://kobli.bage.es) is
>> finishing to bring up to date the default framework to the last update of
>> MARC21, the 14 (April 2012), we will send it to Koha community shortly.
>>
>> We be
Salvete!
>T he working Group of spanish Koha-Kobli community (http://kobli.bage.es) is
> finishing to bring up to date the default framework to the last update of
> MARC21, the 14 (April 2012), we will send it to Koha community shortly.
>
> We believe that it is not at all incompatible to upda
:37
Para: Hillyard, Cecil
CC: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
Asunto: Re: [Koha] RDA fields 336, 337, 338
On 10 May 2012 05:51, Hillyard, Cecil wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Regarding the RDA fields 336, 337, 338 are these in development
> somewhere? Will these be fields that can be completed wit
:37
Para: Hillyard, Cecil
CC: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
Asunto: Re: [Koha] RDA fields 336, 337, 338
On 10 May 2012 05:51, Hillyard, Cecil wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Regarding the RDA fields 336, 337, 338 are these in development
> somewhere? Will these be fields that can be completed wit
On 10 May 2012 05:51, Hillyard, Cecil wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Regarding the RDA fields 336, 337, 338 are these in development
> somewhere? Will these be fields that can be completed with authorized
> values that can be developed locally or things with plugins?
>
Hi Cecil
These could be added to the
Hi All,
Regarding the RDA fields 336, 337, 338 are these in development
somewhere? Will these be fields that can be completed with authorized
values that can be developed locally or things with plugins?
__
Cecil Hillyard
Cataloger
Washoe County Library Technical Services
unding CEO
> CALYX information essentials
> Koha & Kete implementations and services
> T: +61 (2) 80061603 ~ M: +61 (0) 413 510 717
> i...@calyx.net.au ~ www.calyx.net.au
> DM on twitter irmalibraries
> Participating in the Open Source projects:
> http://koha-community.or
0) 413 510 717
i...@calyx.net.au ~ www.calyx.net.au
DM on twitter irmalibraries
Participating in the Open Source projects:
http://koha-community.org & http://kete.net.nz
**
>
>
> Original Message Subject: [Koha] RDA Toolkit Date: Wed,
> 4 Jan 2012 14:46:24 -0800 From:
Hi All,
I've recently been in touch with James Hennelly (future--jhenne...@ala.org)
who is involved in the RDA Toolkit. He drew my attention to their free
MARC linking service (
http://www.rdatoolkit.org/sites/default/files/marc_api_linkguide_final.pdf)
that allows for ILS users to open RDA Toolk
35 matches
Mail list logo
