https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
Lisette Scheer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
koha-US bug tracker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugzi...@koha-us.org
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
Lauren Denny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lauren_de...@sil.org
--
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
Thibault Keromnès changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
--- Comment #9 from Heather ---
Hi, Jonathan! That's great that FAST & ISNI will be included with other data
(I hope *with* the other metadata!)--they would be valuable additions to the
rest of the metadata. And this is kind of on
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Field ---
Thanks Heather, that's interesting. The communication we had was:-
"In line with the British Library and in order to future proof our records, BDS
plans to move to include FAST and ISNI in our
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
--- Comment #7 from Heather ---
(In reply to Jonathan Field from comment #5)
Hi, Jonathan!
FAST is only a project of OCLC, based on Library of Congress Subject Headings:
https://fast.oclc.org/
I haven't heard anything about
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
Katrin Fischer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add FRBRized View to OPAC & |Add FRBRized view to OPAC
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Field ---
These are great ideas and authority records give the consistency (although many
libraries have now stopped using authorities; at least here). The biggest UK
MARC record supplier has recently
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
--- Comment #4 from Heather ---
Oh, Jason, your thoughts are so cataloging-tastic!!
(Please note, all my remarks are MARC21-centric.)
Authority records have long had a role in this sort of clustering, e.g., see
this authority
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
--- Comment #3 from Jason Robb ---
Would love to see this working both in the staff client and OPAC, and would
*really* love to see hold capability added to increase patron ease of access to
resources with multiple editions living
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
Barbara Johnson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=15500
Jessie Zairo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Add FRBRized View to OPAC |Add FRBRized View to OPAC &
13 matches
Mail list logo
