https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Andrew Fuerste-Henry changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andre...@dubcolib.org
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Emmi Takkinen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emmi.takki...@koha-suomi.fi
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Jonathan Druart changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-communit
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Lari Strand changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |Needs Signoff
--
You are rec
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #1 from Lari Strand ---
Created attachment 163087
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=163087&action=edit
Bug 36101: Drop constraint to items.itemnumber from old_reserves-table
This patch rem
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Victor Grousset/tuxayo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Katie Bliss changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kebl...@dmpl.org
--
You are
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Lucas Gass changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Needs Signoff |Signed Off
--
You are receivi
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Lucas Gass changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #163087|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #3 from Lucas Gass ---
Created attachment 163120
-->
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=163120&action=edit
Bug 36101: (follow-up) Fix DBUpdate file permission and perltidy
Signed-off-by: Lucas
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Lucas Gass changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lu...@bywatersolutions.com
---
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #5 from Lari Strand ---
Thank you Lucas.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
___
Koha-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Signed Off |Failed QA
--- Comment #7 f
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Marcel de Rooy changed:
What|Removed |Added
QA Contact|testo...@bugs.koha-communit |m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart ---
Also we have
CONSTRAINT `old_issues_ibfk_2` FOREIGN KEY (`itemnumber`) REFERENCES `items`
(`itemnumber`) ON DELETE SET NULL ON UPDATE SET NULL,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #9 from Lari Strand ---
In our case, we need to find out the biblio details for the deleted item so we
can show these details for patrons in their lists of past loans/old issues.
Without the itemnumber in the old_issues t
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #10 from Lari Strand ---
Sorry, I was supposed to comment this to
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32729, but the same
logic applies here I assume.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #11 from Lari Strand ---
This ticket is just to make handling of these two old_ -tables' itemnumber data
uniform.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #12 from Lari Strand ---
We should also consider the impact this change makes when we join
deleted-tables with "active" tables in the future, when nothing is really
deleted and transferred to somewhere else, but tagged as
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #13 from Marcel de Rooy ---
(In reply to Lari Strand from comment #9)
> "Keeping an itemnumber in this table that does no longer exist is bad
> practice."
>
> We still have deleted-tables so I don't consider the data as
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Andrew Fuerste-Henry changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Failed QA |In Discussion
--- Co
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Andrew Fuerste-Henry changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Nick Clemens changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||n...@bywatersolutions.com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
Kyle M Hall changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.koha-community
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
paxed changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pasi.kalli...@koha-suomi.fi
--- Com
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #16 from Katrin Fischer ---
Hi, I agree with not removing the information about the linked item even if it
was deleted, for the reasons given. But maybe we can find some middle ground
here with the implementation. Have yo
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #17 from Lari Strand ---
> Dont you think that we should adhere to proven standards as to SQL,
> normalization, etc ? :)
I think we should adhere to the needs of the users who use the library system.
We only gain more fu
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #18 from Lucas Gass ---
> Dont you think that we should adhere to proven standards as to SQL,
> normalization, etc ? :)
We should keep the data that librarians want to keep. If the problem is a FK
constraint then that FK
29 matches
Mail list logo