Dear community,
with the start of the release cycle on October 22, work on Koha 3.12
will officially begin. As most of you probably know, there are
several roles to be assigned per release and it is time to do that
for Koha 3.12. There are some proposals for most of the roles
already, they can be
Hello Koha users and developers,
You'll find my monthly newsletter on the website:
http://koha-community.org/koha-release-manager-newsletter-10-2012-08/
The biggest part of this newsletter is dedicated to the upcoming release
release process.
Happy reading !
--
Paul POULAIN
Hi Koha-devel,
I just pushed t/Members_AttributeTypes.t unit tests that fake the
database. The test here could be redundant with t/db_dependent tests
I feel we should be aware of that, and :
* decide Mock is the way to go, and promote using of Mock, removing
db_dependent tests (that fail if you
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Paul Poulain paul.poul...@biblibre.com wrote:
Hi Koha-devel,
I just pushed t/Members_AttributeTypes.t unit tests that fake the
database. The test here could be redundant with t/db_dependent tests
I feel we should be aware of that, and :
* decide Mock is the
Paul,
I just pushed t/Members_AttributeTypes.t unit tests that fake the
database. The test here could be redundant with t/db_dependent tests
I feel we should be aware of that, and :
* decide Mock is the way to go, and promote using of Mock, removing
db_dependent tests (that fail if you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 07-09-12 14:41, Paul Poulain schreef:
* decide Mock is the way to go, and promote using of Mock,
removing db_dependent tests (that fail if you don't have a
database) * decide we should prefer db_dependent tests and limit
the use of Mock to
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Jared Camins-Esakov
jcam...@cpbibliography.com wrote:
Colin,
Do we need to add an explicit step to ensure that the removal is
included in the release notes of the upstream release?
Or will the commit message from [2] suffice
The list of sysprefs in the
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:41:18PM +0200, Paul Poulain wrote:
Hi Koha-devel,
I just pushed t/Members_AttributeTypes.t unit tests that fake the
database. The test here could be redundant with t/db_dependent tests
I feel we should be aware of that, and :
* decide Mock is the way to go, and
At 11:13 AM 9/6/2012 -0300, Tomas Cohen Arazi wrote:
Tomas - I'm taking the liberty of Cc:ing the devel list (you suggested that
you had spoken with some of them) but would thank you for the 'off-list'
exchange of emails.
I have spent quite a bit of time checking various
I have been writing some new unit tests and have had some success using Mock.
I have found that it allows me to have more control over some of the more
unwieldy modules.
So +1 for Mock
On Sep 7, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Colin Campbell colin.campb...@ptfs-europe.com
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at
10 matches
Mail list logo
