Robin Sheat
> Op 16-11-12 08:53, MJ Ray schreef:
> > Probably nothing. Is this mere aggregation, or are you planning to
> > include Bootstrap dependencies into GPL2+ code?
>
> Assuming bootstrap is a JS/CSS library, when you include it into the
> template, you're (I'm not a lawyer) linking in a
On 2012-11-16, at 9:07 AM, Robin Sheat wrote:
> Op 16-11-12 09:00, MJ Ray schreef:
>> I feel that would be misrepresenting GPL2+ code as GPL3+ - lying, more
>> or less. I would prefer it if we only updated headers to GPL3+ when
>> the code in that file actually changes to require the licence cha
Op 16-11-12 08:53, MJ Ray schreef:
> Probably nothing. Is this mere aggregation, or are you planning to
> include Bootstrap dependencies into GPL2+ code?
Assuming bootstrap is a JS/CSS library, when you include it into the
template, you're (I'm not a lawyer) linking in a way very much akin to
lin
Op 16-11-12 09:00, MJ Ray schreef:
> I feel that would be misrepresenting GPL2+ code as GPL3+ - lying, more
> or less. I would prefer it if we only updated headers to GPL3+ when
> the code in that file actually changes to require the licence change.
There is no real point changing the headers on
Mason James
> On 2012-11-15, at 10:04 AM, Magnus Enger wrote:
> > But what do we actually have to do to distribute as GPLv3?
>
> just update the license headers to GPL3 in the Koha codebase, (a
> script can do this task)
I feel that would be misrepresenting GPL2+ code as GPL3+ - lying, more
or l
Owen Leonard
> However, Bootstrap's license is Apache 2.0 which I'm told is
> incompatible with Koha's GPL2 license.
>
> What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
Probably nothing. Is this mere aggregation, or are you planning to
include Bootstrap dependencies into GPL2+ co
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 08:45:54AM +1300, Robin Sheat wrote:
> Distribute it as GPLv3:
+1 for GPLv3+
--
Dobrica Pavlinusic 2share!2flamedpav...@rot13.org
Unix addict. Internet consultant. http://www.rot13.org/~dpavlin
+1 for GPLv3
and a +1 for Bootstrap!
Kyle
http://www.kylehall.info
ByWater Solutions ( http://bywatersolutions.com )
Meadville Public Library ( http://www.meadvillelibrary.org )
Crawford County Federated Library System ( http://www.ccfls.org )
Mill Run Technology Solutions ( http://millruntech.c
+1 for GPL3.
Also, I've been prototyping a new theme written from scratch using Zurb
Foundation (MIT License) as a framework (and SCSS as a css
pre-processor), admittedly it's not got much beyond the opac-main page yet.
I'de be interested to see how your Bootstrap work compares to the
Foundation
On 14 November 2012 22:35, BWS Johnson wrote:
> I'd say simple majority at an IRC meeting with this advertised on the
> agenda so it doesn't sneak up and bite anyone.
I have added it to the agenda:
http://wiki.koha-community.org/wiki/General_IRC_meeting,_5_December_2012
Best regards,
Magnus
+1 for GPL3
___
Koha-devel mailing list
Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community
+1 for GPL3
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Mason James wrote:
>
> On 2012-11-15, at 10:04 AM, Magnus Enger wrote:
>
> What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
> >>>
> >>> Distribute it as GPLv3:
> >
> > +1 from me, if it means being able to use Bootstrap awesomeness
On 2012-11-15, at 10:04 AM, Magnus Enger wrote:
What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
>>>
>>> Distribute it as GPLv3:
>
> +1 from me, if it means being able to use Bootstrap awesomeness.
+1 for GPL3
>
> But what do we actually have to do to distribute as GPLv3?
Magnus Enger schreef op wo 14-11-2012 om 22:04 [+0100]:
> But what do we actually have to do to distribute as GPLv3? Do we just
> have to vote at an IRC meeting, or would all ~200 developers with code
> in Koha have to give their written consent or something?
No, because the code is mostly "GPLv2,
Salvete!
> But what do we actually have to do to distribute as GPLv3? Do we just
> have to vote at an IRC meeting, or would all ~200 developers with code
> in Koha have to give their written consent or something?
>
I'd say simple majority at an IRC meeting with this advertised on the
agend
>>> What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
>>
>> Distribute it as GPLv3:
+1 from me, if it means being able to use Bootstrap awesomeness.
But what do we actually have to do to distribute as GPLv3? Do we just
have to vote at an IRC meeting, or would all ~200 developers with
+1 for GPL3 from me too
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: koha-devel-boun...@lists.koha-community.org im Auftrag von Chris Cormack
Gesendet: Mi 14.11.2012 20:47
An: koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org
Betreff: Re: [Koha-devel] Upgrading Koha's license?
On 15 November 2012 08:45,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Robin Sheat wrote:
> Op 15-11-12 08:40, Owen Leonard schreef:
> > However, Bootstrap's license is Apache 2.0 which I'm told is
> > incompatible with Koha's GPL2 license.
> >
> > What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
>
> Distribute it as GP
> However, Bootstrap's license is Apache 2.0 which I'm told is
> > incompatible with Koha's GPL2 license.
> >
> > What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
>
> Distribute it as GPLv3:
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
>
> http://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index
On 15 November 2012 08:45, Robin Sheat wrote:
> Op 15-11-12 08:40, Owen Leonard schreef:
>> However, Bootstrap's license is Apache 2.0 which I'm told is
>> incompatible with Koha's GPL2 license.
>>
>> What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
>
> Distribute it as GPLv3:
>
> ht
Op 15-11-12 08:40, Owen Leonard schreef:
> However, Bootstrap's license is Apache 2.0 which I'm told is
> incompatible with Koha's GPL2 license.
>
> What do we need to do to make inclusion of Bootstrap possible?
Distribute it as GPLv3:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
http:/
I have been working on incorporating some features of the Bootstrap
framework into Koha (http://twitter.github.com/bootstrap). It offers
some nice features that can help us finish getting rid of YUI.
However, Bootstrap's license is Apache 2.0 which I'm told is
incompatible with Koha's GPL2 license
22 matches
Mail list logo
