Re: Updating libjingle in the tree, using an external one

Pali Rohár writes: > So now libjingle in kopete tree is incompatible with upstream = not possible > to make voice call between kopete and clients which using upstream libjingle. Is it due to specific changes in Kopete's copy of libjingle or did Google also drop compatibility in general between u

Re: [kopete-devel] Convert to git?

On Sunday 26 February 2012 19:00:48 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Pali Rohár writes: > > On Tuesday 14 July 2009 22:27:45 Matt Rogers wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there any interest in being one of the first few projects that > >> converts > >> from subversion to git? > >> > >> I know personally,

Re: Updating libjingle in the tree, using an external one

On Sunday 26 February 2012 18:57:33 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Pali Rohár writes: > > So now libjingle in kopete tree is incompatible with upstream = not > > possible to make voice call between kopete and clients which using > > upstream libjingle. > Is it due to specific changes in Kopete's c

Re: [kopete-devel] Convert to git?

Pali Rohár writes: > On Tuesday 14 July 2009 22:27:45 Matt Rogers wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any interest in being one of the first few projects that converts >> from subversion to git? >> >> I know personally, that it would make it easier on me, since i'm already >> using git-svn to interface

Re: Review Request: Group Offline contacts into a separate group "Offline Users"

> On July 4, 2010, 2:14 a.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > Well, nobody has given a NACK yet, so I presume this is a tacit ACK :) > > > > Does this patch still apply fine to trunk? It'd be good to apply it now > > that trunk is unfrozen for SC 4.6. > > Lamarque Souza wrote: > Well, I t

Re: Review Request: Group Offline contacts into a separate group "Offline Users"

> On July 4, 2010, 2:14 a.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > Well, nobody has given a NACK yet, so I presume this is a tacit ACK :) > > > > Does this patch still apply fine to trunk? It'd be good to apply it now > > that trunk is unfrozen for SC 4.6. > > Lamarque Souza wrote: > Well, I t

Re: Review Request: Group Offline contacts into a separate group "Offline Users"

> On July 4, 2010, 2:14 a.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > Well, nobody has given a NACK yet, so I presume this is a tacit ACK :) > > > > Does this patch still apply fine to trunk? It'd be good to apply it now > > that trunk is unfrozen for SC 4.6. Well, I tried the updated patch from Pali

Re: Review Request: Group Offline contacts into a separate group "Offline Users"

On Sunday 26 February 2012 13:24:24 Lamarque V. Souza wrote: > Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu: > > On Saturday 25 February 2012 20:58:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Here is updated patch which apply on kopete from trunk. > > > > I tested patch and seems to work as described in review r

Re: Review Request: Group Offline contacts into a separate group "Offline Users"

Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu: > On Saturday 25 February 2012 20:58:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > > Here is updated patch which apply on kopete from trunk. > > I tested patch and seems to work as described in review request. The patch does not cleanly apply here. It requires ch

Re: Review Request: Group Offline contacts into a separate group "Offline Users"

On Saturday 25 February 2012 20:58:33 Pali Rohár wrote: > Here is updated patch which apply on kopete from trunk. > I tested patch and seems to work as described in review request. -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [kopete-devel] Convert to git?

On Tuesday 14 July 2009 22:27:45 Matt Rogers wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any interest in being one of the first few projects that converts > from subversion to git? > > I know personally, that it would make it easier on me, since i'm already > using git-svn to interface with subversion most of the ti

Re: Review Request: Some fixes for cryptography plugin

> On Feb. 26, 2012, 11:52 a.m., Lamarque Souza wrote: > > trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/cryptographyplugin.h, line 89 > > > > > > Do you know if this plugin really works with all those protocols? If so >

Re: Patches for Kopete on reviewboard

On Sunday 26 February 2012 09:00:28 Lamarque V. Souza wrote: > Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu: > > Hi, can be this patch commited also to stable 4.8 branch? > > http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision82230 > > Done: > > http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision822

Re: Patches for Kopete on reviewboard

Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu: > Hi, can be this patch commited also to stable 4.8 branch? > http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1282230 Done: http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision=1282275 -- Lamarque V. Souza KDE's Network Management maintainer http

Re: Review Request: Some fixes for cryptography plugin

> On Feb. 26, 2012, 11:52 a.m., Lamarque Souza wrote: > > trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/cryptographyplugin.h, line 89 > > > > > > Do you know if this plugin really works with all those protocols? If so >

Re: Patches for Kopete on reviewboard

Em Sunday 26 February 2012, Pali Rohár escreveu: > Hi, Hi, > here is another my review patch: > https://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6768/ The patch seems ok. > But it is for cryptography plugin which is in extragear: > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptog

Re: Review Request: Some fixes for cryptography plugin

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6768/#review10703 --- trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/cryptographyplugin.h

Re: Patches for Kopete on reviewboard

> > I'm trying to configure Kopete to work with Oracle Beehive > > (Jabber/XMPP). When I try to connect I get a toaster notification that > > says, "There was an error authenticating with the server. Login failed > > with unknown reason." For the jabber protocol, there exists a context menu "xml c

Re: Patches for Kopete on reviewboard

Hi, can be this patch commited also to stable 4.8 branch? http://websvn.kde.org/?view=revision&revision82230 -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-dev

Re: Updating libjingle in the tree, using an external one

On Sunday 24 July 2011 10:52:33 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Pali Rohár writes: > > When 0.5.3 release I will try rewrite swtoolkit to cmake. Then sync > > code and apply flushing patch. > > 0.5.8 was released some time ago, and the alloca.h problem persists. Do > you need any help with this? H

Re: Patches for Kopete on reviewboard

Hi, here is another my review patch: https://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/6768/ But it is for cryptography plugin which is in extragear: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/network/kopete-cryptography/ Why is this plugin not in kopete trunk? I'm using it more years and I did not see any problems.