As Jeff Scott expressed, Bob was one of the good guys. Bob helped me
with the nine Gatherings at Mt. Vernon by hosting the KR Gathering
web page. He was always Johnny on the spot in responding to my
request to post updates to the site and made all the changes
requested. I don't ever
At 01:59 PM 5/9/2014, you wrote:
>I still used my flaps almost EVERY landing. The few times I didn't
>use them (just to stay proficient), I felt like I was landing downwind!
+
I landed down wind once
I am deeply sadden by Bob,s passing. I will keep him and his family in my
prayers.Joe Horton
Do THIS before eating carbs every time
1 EASY tip to increase fat-burning, lower blood sugar & decrease fat storage
> I AM curious about
>all the talk of adding drag to the KR to slow it down.
> I have flown several low drag / clean aircraft without flaps and
>never had any unnerving problems with landing.
> Doran
>
On the first flight in my KR,
Hello Hennie,
You don't have to put that engine in a KR. If that opportunity came my
way, I would take advantage of it even if I did not have a use for the
engine. There is certain to be an opportunity for some old-fashioned
horse trading somewhere along the line...
Chris
On 5/8/2014 11:42
Doran,
I don't know about other aircraft, but I do know that the KR is one slick
little bird. It took me a while to accept the fact that it needed some drag
for landing. The reason is because when you are set up on final and have the
appropriate attitude to maintain the speed you want, you
Doran Jaffas wrote:
> I have flown several low drag / clean aircraft without flaps and
> never had any unnerving problems with landing.
Then you may not have tried to get a KR to stick to the ground when trying
to get into a short strip!
> My personal opinion banded on some experience
Not to start an argument, but I have to disagree ; )
How a prop works on a particular airplane is based on the amount of
air moved (past the cowl, not smashing into it) and the velocity of
that air. I have never been able to find a real reference to the
?large diameter prop=better climb? theory
Fly with the angels now. Rest in peace Mr. Lee.
Thanks,
Barron
The longer the prop the better climb performance of the aircraft.The magic
of prop science never seems clear.That maybe why we call it
EXPERIMENTAL.And yes I do learn a lot from it.Tommy W.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Randall Smith via KRnet <
krnet at list.krnet.org> wrote:
> Every prop I
Blue Skies to Bob, Save a cloud for me.
Bob Frazeysburg Oh.
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet <
krnet at list.krnet.org> wrote:
> Many of us got to know Bob through the Gatherings. He was always there
> carrying on conversations, exchanging ideas, and helping where he
Many of us got to know Bob through the Gatherings. He was always there
carrying on conversations, exchanging ideas, and helping where he could.
See below...
From: Cheryl Lee [ shortbus1017 at gmail.com ]
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 8:07 AM
To: 'Mark Langford'
Subject: Bob
It is with a very
Hi again KRNetters,
Does anyone perhaps have a link available of any more detail on how to make
these:
http://www.love4aviation.com/DYNAERO/Technologyindex/Wing+Design/Pilots-June+2003.html
I can come up with a rough idea, but I'm sure there is a better way. How is the
forward airfoil of the
13 matches
Mail list logo