My first engine in my kr was a hapi. Crank broke at about 65 hrs. Prop left the
plane. Funny feeling. Made it to a pasture.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 17, 2016, at 11:39 AM, svd via KRnet wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestion of the Revmaster crank and prop hub Mark.
> Why? Any other sug
Unless you come in under about 525 empty a 65 horse is not enough. I am one
that believes more hp more speed. I built my kr for speed. Weighed 480 at first
flight. 1836 65hp. Then 2180 75hp. After 6 engine failures ( i ran them wide
open) i went with a cont 85 broke a crank. Went with an O200. S
Keep 65 HP in mind, any more the KR doesn't need
On Sun, 4/17/16, krnet-request at list.krnet.org wrote:
Subject: KRnet Digest, Vol 4, Issue 100
To: krnet at list.krnet.org
Date: Sunday, April 17, 2016, 11:00 AM
Send KRnet mailing list submissions
The 94 is thinner than the 92.Revmaster crank setup is different than the
HAPI and GPAS.All are good just different.Use the one you like.Tommy W.
On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:39 AM, svd via KRnet
wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion of the Revmaster crank and prop hub Mark.
> Why? Any other suggest
Thanks for the suggestion of the Revmaster crank and prop hub Mark.
Why? Any other suggestions? Heads?
It does seem a shame to rip apart the HAPI, but I keep getting ominous opinions
of its airworthiness.
> On Apr 17, 2016, at 9:00 AM, krnet-request at list.krnet.org wrote:
>
> Send K
5 matches
Mail list logo
