Did I read that right Mark? Rolls? :)
Did you do anything special to beef up the structure or is it fine as it is
for simple aerobatics? I see the KR-2 plans say + or - 7G, but what about
the KR2S?
Brad Payne
www.n494bp.com
bradleyspa...@gmail.com
>
>Did you do anything special to beef up the structure or is it fine as it is
>for simple aerobatics? I see the KR-2 plans say + or - 7G, but what about
>the KR2S?
>Brad Payne
That's +/- 7 G's at 800 pounds !! You need to
For my own knowledge were does the # 5600 come from. I
have never figured g load and with my loaded weight it
really brings me down on the g load to 4.6 I know on
some planes + and - are different. is there a
different # to figure - g ?
--- Larry Flesner wrote:
>
> >
>
At 07:50 AM 3/12/2007, you wrote:
>For my own knowledge were does the # 5600 come from.
+++
+ / - 7G's at 800 pounds.
7 X 800 = 5600 pounds = design maximum weight the
structure will carry. If your KR weighs 1000 pounds, the
structure will still only
If you do it right, you should not impose more than 1g on the airframe
in a roll.
Jeff
On 3/12/07, Larry Flesner wrote:
> At 07:50 AM 3/12/2007, you wrote:
> >For my own knowledge were does the # 5600 come from.
> +++
>
> + / -
How many Gs you will see if you don't do it right depends on how bad you
botch the maneuver. I wouldn't have any concerns about rolling a KR, but I
have some aerobatic experience. I would not recommend rolling anything
until you get a few hours of aerobatic training first.
Brian Kraut
: www.whisperaircraft.com
mailto: av...@telkomsa.net
- Original Message -
From: "J L" <schml...@gmail.com>
To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 5:32 PM
Subject: Re: KR> Rolling the KR
> If you do it right, you should not impose more than 1g on the airframe
> in a roll.
>
> Jeff
That would be 2Gs We are at 1G just sitting here. I
have loop, rolled, spun and even got my KR in a tale
skid (pulled to hard while to far back in CG). It will
straighten out with very little effort. Get some
altitude and have fun.
Thanks Larry
--- J L wrote:
> If you do
Actually, I meant 1g, or as in you should pull nothing over 1g in an
axial roll. In other words, you would not "pull" anything, just
maintain 1g all the way around.
Sorry for the lack of clarity.
Jeff
On 3/12/07, Randy Smith wrote:
> That would be 2Gs We are at 1G just
9 matches
Mail list logo