KR> fuel burn vs Hp

You guys might be over thinking this. In theory that calculation is possible if. You have perfect carburation (but you don't) you have perfect timing (but you don't) Your manifolds are 100% efficient (but they aren't) your fuel burn is based on top output at stp (but it isn't, its an

KR> fuel burn vs Hp

s.buil...@juno.com> Subject: Re: KR> fuel burn vs Hp List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:24:29 +1000 so Based on my calcs, HP= G/h * 6 / BSFC or 7.8*6/.5= 93.6 Hp BSFC for a low comp carby engine is ~ .5 @ max power ~.45 at max TQ. @4.8 gph you are getting ~ 57.6 H

KR> fuel burn vs Hp

so Based on my calcs, HP= G/h * 6 / BSFC or 7.8*6/.5= 93.6 Hp BSFC for a low comp carby engine is ~ .5 @ max power ~.45 at max TQ. @4.8 gph you are getting ~ 57.6 Hp Paul. "joe.kr2s.buil...@juno.com" wrote: -- fuel burn for first 1000 7.8 gph -- fuel burn was

KR> fuel burn vs Hp

Hey Guys, I saw a post over the weekend that was doing the math for fuel burn and the associated hp produced. I have not written a lot of things down that i know about my plane so i took the opertunity on the way home yesterday to check fuel burn and no I have not done the math so who ever does