That makes sense... thanks for the feedback.
> Yes, you are supposed to recover from a stall or spin with the rudder;
> however, the full length (almost) aileron combined with the tiny short
> coupled rudder on the KR makes standard actions not necessarily the best.
>
> At 06:56 PM 9/1/2003
ber 01, 2003 1:56 PM
Subject: KR>Re: KR Aileron control at low speeds?
> Has anyone looked at the SIZE of a KR aileron...
> I can't believe there are problems with aileron response
> at low speeds... the darn aileron is nearly the length
> of the entire wingspan!
>
>
Yes, you are supposed to recover from a stall or spin with the rudder;
however, the full length (almost) aileron combined with the tiny short
coupled rudder on the KR makes standard actions not necessarily the best.
At 06:56 PM 9/1/2003 +0100, you wrote:
>Has anyone looked at the SIZE of a KR
Has anyone looked at the SIZE of a KR aileron...
I can't believe there are problems with aileron response
at low speeds... the darn aileron is nearly the length
of the entire wingspan!
Besides at REAL low speeds, i.e. Slow flight near
the stall... if a wing drops, you are supposed to use
All,
My KR came as a built unit by Mark Edal. I have inspections dated 1994. He
stretched a KR2 to 16.5' + but kept the KR2 stab and rudder. I can't lift a
wing with rudder as it will increase the drop of the wing. It follows a turn
nicely at 80mph without rudder input. On climbout I put a little
: KR>Re: KR Aileron control at low speeds?
Has anyone looked at the SIZE of a KR aileron...
I can't believe there are problems with aileron response
at low speeds... the darn aileron is nearly the length
of the entire wingspan!
Besides at REAL low speeds, i.e. Slow flight near
the st
Jim,
The ailerons are fine ,just the rudder will not lift a wing. I am not sure
if I can spin this bird and will not try. In all other respects she flies
like my 150 did. Al
7 matches
Mail list logo