Re: [kubernetes-users] Re: [GRAYMAIL] Re: Bare Metal SIG

2016-12-01 Thread Ihor Dvoretskyi
SIG On-Prem was one of the initial namings of the SIG when the new SIG discussion had been initiated. I've upvoted this naming and absolutely will do it now. The only note that I have - we have SIG-OpenStack, that covers the on-prem solutions as well. - we have to find the way how our [overlapping

Re: [kubernetes-users] Re: [GRAYMAIL] Re: Bare Metal SIG

2016-11-30 Thread Joseph Jacks
I think SIG-On-Prem makes a lot of sense! +1 from me on that name. Will wait another day for feedback before getting it created hopefully with Sarah's help. Thanks, JJ. > On Nov 30, 2016, at 10:37 AM, Isaac Arias wrote: > > sig-datacenter > > From: Sandeep Srinivasa > Date: Wednesday, Nov

[kubernetes-users] Re: [GRAYMAIL] Re: Bare Metal SIG

2016-11-30 Thread Isaac Arias
sig-datacenter From: Sandeep Srinivasa Date: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 7:33 AM To: Tomasz 'Zen' Napierala Cc: Rakesh Malhotra , Kubernetes user discussion and Q&A , Kubernetes developer/contributor discussion , Justin Garrison , Isaac Arias Subject: [GRAYMAIL] Re: Bare Metal SIG I agr