*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1968725 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968725
Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make
this software better. This particular crash has already been reported
and is a duplicate of bug #1968725, so is being marked as such.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: baloo-kf5 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to baloo-kf5 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968
Erich, where is the kinetic verification? Michael tested jammy in
comment #5, not kinetic.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to sddm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2009074
Title:
[SRU Regression] SDDM display inset p
Terribly sorry, meant to comment and got distracted. The goal was that
the script would actually run. I was able to verify that in a VM myself
and it validates the previous SRU. The functionality was already known
to actually work.
If this SRU isn't allowed through on the script actually running a
Hi Erich,
my comment was more about the lack of a statement on the kinetic
testing. What we look for is an execution of the proposed test plan with
the package in proposed for the ubuntu release under test.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is
