[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 -> 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.

2010-10-18 Thread N7DR
Attachment file /var/lib/dpkg/status. ** Attachment added: "copy of /var/lib/dpkg/status" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/639933/+attachment/1700858/+files/attachment2.txt -- 10.04 -> 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x1

[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 -> 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades - Couldn't configure pre-depend x11-common for x11-xkb-utils, probably a dependency cycle.

2010-10-18 Thread N7DR
Reply to #19: Sorry, I thought I would be automatically notified of any new comments (like kde-bugs) but it seems that commentators are not automatically subscribed here, so I only just saw your request. I just tried to upgrade again, and (of course) still hit the same bug. Attaching a directory

[Bug 488911] Re: needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-29 Thread N7DR
For some rather odd value of the word "fine", yes, they do. Not really relevant to trying to support large projects for server code though, which was the point of my original report. I'm still not sure why this policy has been applied to kdevelop when a quick review of the official repositories i

[Bug 488911] Re: needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-29 Thread N7DR
OK. Has the person who set that policy actually tried to develop C++ code on karmic? I'll have to go find a distro that supports developers, I guess :-( I don't have time to waste on silliness. I have to produce working code. -- needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta) h

[Bug 488911] [NEW] needs-packaging kdevelop3 (because kdevelop4 is low-quality beta)

2009-11-26 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdevelop Canonical seems to have chosen to supply kdevelop4 without any option to install kdevelop3. This seems to be a grave mistake, for at least the following reasons: 1. kdevelop3 is a released stable product; kdevelop4 is in beta 2. There is no hel

[Bug 482921] Re: Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error

2009-11-15 Thread N7DR
Then it seems to me that the bug is that there is a menu item that says there is documentation. That menu item should surely not exist. -- Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482921 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kub

[Bug 482921] Re: Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error

2009-11-14 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35706032/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35706033/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35706034/ProcStatus.txt -- Attemp

[Bug 482921] [NEW] Attempt to access kdevelop handbook fails with error

2009-11-14 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdevelop Attempting to open the kdevelop handbook from the kdevelop Help menu produces the error: the file or folder help:/kdevelop/index.html does not exist It seems like some documentation package that should be installed along with kdevelop is bein

[Bug 479724] Re: krecipies help says "The file or folder help:/krecipes/index.html does not exist"

2009-11-09 Thread N7DR
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35451242/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35451243/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35451244/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachm

[Bug 479724] [NEW] krecipies help says "The file or folder help:/krecipes/index.html does not exist"

2009-11-09 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdebase-runtime karmic: When clicking krecipes Help | Krecipes Handbook,the user simply gets a message saying: "The file or folder help:/krecipes/index.html does not exist". So it looks like some documentation package isn't being installed correctly when

[Bug 411193] [NEW] wish: moving/copying photos in digikam should automatically rename the underlying file if necessary

2009-08-09 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: digikam 64-bit Kubuntu jaunty; digikam 0.10.0. It is far too hard to organize one's pictures in digikam if one uses multiple cameras. The root of the problem lies in the fact that each camera will independently name its image files. So if one imports fi

[Bug 318308] [NEW] no help for kontact

2009-01-17 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kontact Pressing Help | Kontact Handbook brings up the following message: There is no documentation available for /kontact/index.html I am using 64-bit Kubuntu intrepid (8.10) fully up to date. kontact package: 4:4.1.4-0ubuntu1~intrepid1 ** Affects:

[Bug 305519] Re: include debug version of libkorganizerprivate.so

2008-12-09 Thread N7DR
I don't understand. If it doesn't get used at runtime, how can it appear in a kontact crash backtrace? -- include debug version of libkorganizerprivate.so https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305519 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kde

[Bug 132001] Re: [Hardy] Ksnapshot not binding to PrtScrn.

2008-11-19 Thread N7DR
Wesley: yes, this would be easy to work around in KDE3. KDE4 seems to be completely different :-( The only "workaround" I've been able to find so far is to run ksnapshot manually. -- [Hardy] Ksnapshot not binding to PrtScrn. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132001 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 212583] [NEW] wishlist: fix that no easy way to duplicate kontact information from one computer to another

2008-04-05 Thread N7DR
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kontact Using: kontact 1.2.9 kubuntu gutsy If there is an easy way to transfer all one's kontact contacts from one machine to another, then it's not at all obvious, either to me or to anyone else on the Kubuntu-users reflector. I have tried copying:

[Bug 197111] Re: wishlist: kpdf needs option to view facing pages

2008-03-01 Thread N7DR
If this can be done in okular then I agree that there's no point in continuing with the request here. Thanks very much. -- wishlist: kpdf needs option to view facing pages https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197111 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is

[Bug 197111] Re: wishlist: kpdf needs option to view facing pages

2008-02-29 Thread N7DR
But then it's not the SAME document. (And requires a tool that would insert a page of the right type at the beginning of a PDF.) (and this makes all kinds of assumptions that the user has sufficient permissions to alter the PDF [perhaps it's signed; perhaps it's on a read-only filesystem; etc., et

[Bug 159530] Re: (Gutsy) K3b can not burn files larger than 4GB

2007-12-15 Thread N7DR
Oh, I hadn't realised that one could receive backports from a version of Ubuntu that wasn't even releasd yet :-) I have enabled the backports in sources.list and am downloading these and other new versions from that respository right now. Thank you very much for making me aware of thise. -- (Gu

[Bug 159530] Re: (Gutsy) K3b can not burn files larger than 4GB

2007-12-15 Thread N7DR
So now I'm really confused... I see those files there, but why didn't my system pick them up automatically? Like I say, I have never touched my sources.list file, so shouldn't I have automatically received these updates? I've certainly been notified of (and installed) loads of other updates, but n

[Bug 155490] Re: [gutsy] Screensavers don't start automatically in Kubuntu

2007-11-26 Thread N7DR
I confirm this also, on a desktop machine running a clean install of gutsy 64 bit. It worked fine in dapper. -- [gutsy] Screensavers don't start automatically in Kubuntu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/155490 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a