Hi, all
This is KVM biweekly test result against kvm.git:
51ef04ce3219d05c88f204342b2db294b5590d0a and qemu-kvm.git:
3e6f07b0c86b7fabfce72c1a42e54b2ad79dc587.
There is no new bugs during the two weeks.
Five Old Issues:
1. Hot-added device is not
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:11:33AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:28:15AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> If so, I will try to write something like this the next days. Will
> >> surely appreciate your review afterwards!
> >
> > Sounds good!
> >
>
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 01:11 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 09:28:15AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> If so, I will try to write something like this the next days. Will
> >> surely appreciate your review afterwards!
> >
> > Sounds good!
> >
>
> Here
Exit the guest pagetable walk loop if reading gpte failed. Otherwise its
possible to enter an endless loop processing the previous present pte.
Cc: sta...@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index 58a0f1e..ede2131 100644
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:09:32PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> PCI cards can access system memory directly. If you assign a card
> to a guest, the guest will program the card to transfer data to
> system memory using guest addresses; since guest addresses don't
> correspond to host addresses, m
On 01/14/2010 08:31 PM, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:54:51PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/14/2010 05:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Michael, I think 'DisINTx-' means the device is not PCI 2.3 compliant?
No it doesn't, just that interrupt
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:54:51PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/14/2010 05:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> >>Michael, I think 'DisINTx-' means the device is not PCI 2.3 compliant?
> >No it doesn't, just that interrupt disable bit is not set.
>
> Thanks. Ryan, while kvm doesn't suppor
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 16:12 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Allow paravirtualized guest to do special handling for some page faults.
>
> The patch adds one 'if' to do_page_fault() function. The call is patched
> out when running on physical HW. I ran kernbech on the kernel with and
> without that add
kvm_get_exit_data() cannot return a NULL pointer.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin
---
arch/ia64/kvm/kvm_fw.c | 28 +---
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm_fw.c b/arch/ia64/kvm/kvm_fw.c
index e4b8231..cb548ee 100644
--- a/arch/ia
On 01/14/2010 05:47 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Michael, I think 'DisINTx-' means the device is not PCI 2.3 compliant?
No it doesn't, just that interrupt disable bit is not set.
Thanks. Ryan, while kvm doesn't support assigning a device with shared
interrupts now, in the future
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 05:34:42PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/14/2010 05:26 PM, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> >
> >Also, just for further complication, the Ricoh chip does not support
> >MSI and shares an
On 01/14/2010 05:26 PM, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> >Also, just for further complication, the Ricoh chip does not support
> >MSI and shares an IRQ on the system board with the USB host controller.
> >I have rebound the U
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:59:53PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> >Also, just for further complication, the Ricoh chip does not support
> >MSI and shares an IRQ on the system board with the USB host controller.
> >I have rebound the USB host controller to pci-stub, but I'm not sure if
> >that total
On 01/14/2010 04:34 PM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Strangely, autotest only caught this on AMD and even it took a while.
Lucas, can you integrate something like the following into autotest,
so we exercise the preemption code harder?
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:11 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > Strangely, autotest only caught this on AMD and even it took a while.
> > Lucas, can you integrate something like the following into autotest,
> > so we exercise the preemption code harder?
All right Avi, just added it to our TODO list, t
On 01/14/2010 04:06 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
x/5i $eip
0x7f317ab64a7b: movdqa %xmm0,(%rdi)
0x7f317ab64a7f: movdqa %xmm0,0x10(%rdi)
0x7f317ab64a84: movdqa %xmm0,0x20(%rdi)
0x7f317ab64a89: movdqa %xmm0,0x30(%rdi)
0x7f317ab64a8e: movdqa %xmm0,0x40(%rdi)
Same va
Hey,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 03:51:43PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/14/2010 12:18 AM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> >
> > /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --version QEMU PC emulator version
> > 0.12.1 (qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
> >
> >KVM internal error. Sube
On 01/11/2010 12:15 AM, Ryan C. Underwood wrote:
I guess I'll run the things I've found by the list to see if I'm off
track or not.
There is this patch:
http://marc.info/?l=xen-devel&m=124748015304566&w=4
which would seem to be related to what I'm doing, trying to pass through
a multifunction d
On 01/14/2010 12:18 AM, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
/usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --version QEMU PC emulator version 0.12.1
(qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2), Copyright (c) 2003-2008 Fabrice Bellard
KVM internal error. Suberror: 1
rax 7f53c1c96000 rbx rcx rdx
00
Bugs item #2932002, was opened at 2010-01-14 13:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loumy
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2932002&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thr
(actually copying Lucas).
On 01/14/2010 03:11 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/30/2009 06:25 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Defer fpu deactivation as much as possible - if the guest fpu is
loaded, keep
it loaded until the next heavyweight exit (where we are forced to
unload it).
This reduces unnecessary ex
On 12/30/2009 06:25 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Defer fpu deactivation as much as possible - if the guest fpu is loaded, keep
it loaded until the next heavyweight exit (where we are forced to unload it).
This reduces unnecessary exits.
We also defer fpu activation on clts; while clts signals the inten
Bugs item #2932002, was opened at 2010-01-14 14:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by avik
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2932002&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thre
Bugs item #2932002, was opened at 2010-01-14 13:10
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loumy
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2932002&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thr
Bugs item #2932002, was opened at 2010-01-14 13:10
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by loumy
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=2932002&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the co
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 17:36:49 you wrote:
> Hi!
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 17:20 +0100, Thomas Beinicke wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to migrate lots of VMWare server VMs to KVM. The linux machines
> are not much of a problem but the windows machines cause me some headaches.
>
> Does a
26 matches
Mail list logo
