Alex
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Alex Rixhardson
wrote:
> virtio...I think :-).
>
> How could I confirm that?
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
>> On 08/17/2010 12:51 AM, Alex Rixhardson wrote:
>>>
>>&g
virtio...I think :-).
How could I confirm that?
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 12:51 AM, Alex Rixhardson wrote:
>>
>> I tried with 'notsc divider=10' (since it's 64 bit guest), but the
>> results are the stil
I tried with 'notsc divider=10' (since it's 64 bit guest), but the
results are the still same :-(. The guest is idle at the time of
testing. It has 2 CPU and 1024 MB RAM available.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 12:22 AM, Alex Rixhardson wrote
bad on RHEL 4.5 guest. What could be wrong?
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 08/16/2010 10:00 PM, Alex Rixhardson wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I have the following configuration:
>>
>> 1. host is RHEL 5.5, 64bit with
Hi guys,
I have the following configuration:
1. host is RHEL 5.5, 64bit with KVM (version that comes out of the box
with RHEL 5.5)
2. two guests:
2a: RHEL 5.5, 32bit,
2b: RHEL 4.5, 64bit
If I run iperf between host RHEL 5.5 and guest RHEL 5.5 inside the
virtual network subnet I get great results
