Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:40:46AM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote: > > - "Michael Goldish" wrote: > > > - "Yolkfull Chow" wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 06:30:14PM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote: > > > > > > > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Tue,

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

- "Michael Goldish" wrote: > - "Yolkfull Chow" wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 06:30:14PM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote: > > > > > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Michael > > Goldish > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

- "Yolkfull Chow" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 06:30:14PM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote: > > > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Michael > Goldish > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > > > > > >> O

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 06:30:14PM -0400, Michael Goldish wrote: > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Michael Goldish > > wrote: > > > > > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > > > >> Ok, very good, similarly to the previous patchset, I re

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

>> Ok Michael, turns out the win2000 failure was a silly mistake. So, >> after checking the code and going trough light testing, I applied >> this >> patchset >> >> http://autotest.kernel.org/changeset/3553 >> http://autotest.kernel.org/changeset/3554 >> http://autotest.kernel.org/changeset/3555 >>

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

- "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Michael Goldish > wrote: > > > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > > > >> Ok, very good, similarly to the previous patchset, I rebased one > of > >> the patches and applied the set, I am making tests with an rss

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Michael Goldish wrote: > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > >> Ok, very good, similarly to the previous patchset, I rebased one of >> the patches and applied the set, I am making tests with an rss binary >> generated by the cross compiler. >> >> I am testi

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:15 AM, Michael Goldish wrote: > > - "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > >> Ok, very good, similarly to the previous patchset, I rebased one of >> the patches and applied the set, I am making tests with an rss binary >> generated by the cross compiler. >> >> I am testi

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

- "Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues" wrote: > Ok, very good, similarly to the previous patchset, I rebased one of > the patches and applied the set, I am making tests with an rss binary > generated by the cross compiler. > > I am testing with Winxp 32 bit, so far so good and rss.exe works as > expe

Re: [Autotest] [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH 0/7] KVM test: support for the new remote shell server for Windows

Ok, very good, similarly to the previous patchset, I rebased one of the patches and applied the set, I am making tests with an rss binary generated by the cross compiler. I am testing with Winxp 32 bit, so far so good and rss.exe works as expected. I guess I will test more with other hosts, but I