On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:14:47 +0200
Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/25/2010 10:40 PM, Izik Eidus wrote:
> >
> >> Or is this a feature you need?
> >>
> >
> > I dont need it (I asked Avi to do something), So he said he want to nuke
> > the aliasing
> > from kvm and keep supporting the old userspace
On 01/25/2010 10:40 PM, Izik Eidus wrote:
Or is this a feature you need?
I dont need it (I asked Avi to do something), So he said he want to nuke the
aliasing
from kvm and keep supporting the old userspace`s
Do you have any other way to achive this?
Btw I do realize it might be bette
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:49:25 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:40:32PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:39 -0200
> > Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > > With current code, if a memslot is deleted, access through any aliases
> > > that use it will fail
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:40:32PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:39 -0200
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> > With current code, if a memslot is deleted, access through any aliases
> > that use it will fail (BTW it looks this is not properly handled, but
> > thats a separate pro
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:20:39 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> With current code, if a memslot is deleted, access through any aliases
> that use it will fail (BTW it looks this is not properly handled, but
> thats a separate problem).
Yea I had some still open concerns about this code (this why I
eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Izik Eidus
> > > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41 +0200
> > > Subject: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework
> > >
> > > This patch remove the old way of aliasing inside kvm
> > > and move into using aliasing with the sam
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:45:53 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Izik,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:53:44PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> > >From f94dcd1ccabbcdb51ed7c37c5f58f00a5c1b7eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Izik Eidus
> > Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41
Izik,
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 03:53:44PM +0200, Izik Eidus wrote:
> >From f94dcd1ccabbcdb51ed7c37c5f58f00a5c1b7eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Izik Eidus
> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework
>
> This patch remove the old way o
>From f94dcd1ccabbcdb51ed7c37c5f58f00a5c1b7eec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Izik Eidus
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:49:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] RFC: alias rework
This patch remove the old way of aliasing inside kvm
and move into using aliasing with the same virtual addresses
This patch