On 04/25/2013 04:58:51 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.04.2013, at 20:02, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/19/2013 09:06:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> + if (notify_eoi != -1) {
>> + spin_unlock_irq(&opp->lock);
>> + kvm_notify_acked_irq(opp->kvm, 0, notify_eoi);
>> +
On 23.04.2013, at 08:38, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:06:26PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Now that all the irq routing and irqfd pieces are generic, we can expose
>> real irqchip support to all of KVM's internal helpers.
>>
>> This allows us to use irqfd with the in-ker
On 19.04.2013, at 20:02, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/19/2013 09:06:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/mpic.txt
>> b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/mpic.txt
>> index ce98e32..dadc1e0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/mpic.txt
>> +++ b/D
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:06:26PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Now that all the irq routing and irqfd pieces are generic, we can expose
> real irqchip support to all of KVM's internal helpers.
>
> This allows us to use irqfd with the in-kernel MPIC.
[snip]
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/mpic.
On 04/18/2013 07:15:46 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.04.2013, at 23:39, Scott Wood wrote:
> Do we really want any default routes? There's no platform notion
of GSI
> here, so how is userspace to know how the kernel set it up (or what
GSIs
> are free to be used for new routes) -- other th
On 04/19/2013 09:06:26 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/mpic.txt
b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/mpic.txt
index ce98e32..dadc1e0 100644
--- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/mpic.txt
+++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/mpic.txt
@@ -35,3 +35,14 @
Now that all the irq routing and irqfd pieces are generic, we can expose
real irqchip support to all of KVM's internal helpers.
This allows us to use irqfd with the in-kernel MPIC.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
---
v2 -> v3:
- make mpic pointer type safe
- add wmb before setting global mp
On 04/18/2013 08:09:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.04.2013, at 02:50, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 07:15:46 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 18.04.2013, at 23:39, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On 04/18/2013 09:11:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >> +static inline int irqchip_in_kernel(struct kv
On 19.04.2013, at 02:50, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 07:15:46 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 18.04.2013, at 23:39, Scott Wood wrote:
>> > On 04/18/2013 09:11:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> >> +static inline int irqchip_in_kernel(struct kvm *kvm)
>> >> +{
>> >> + int ret = 0;
>> >> +
>> >>
On 04/18/2013 07:15:46 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 18.04.2013, at 23:39, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 09:11:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> +static inline int irqchip_in_kernel(struct kvm *kvm)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_MPIC
>> + ret = ret || (kvm->arch.
On 18.04.2013, at 23:39, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 09:11:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> Now that all the irq routing and irqfd pieces are generic, we can expose
>> real irqchip support to all of KVM's internal helpers.
>> This allows us to use irqfd with the in-kernel MPIC.
>> Signed-off
On 04/18/2013 09:11:55 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Now that all the irq routing and irqfd pieces are generic, we can
expose
real irqchip support to all of KVM's internal helpers.
This allows us to use irqfd with the in-kernel MPIC.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kv
Now that all the irq routing and irqfd pieces are generic, we can expose
real irqchip support to all of KVM's internal helpers.
This allows us to use irqfd with the in-kernel MPIC.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/kvm_host.h |7 ++
arch/powerpc/include/uapi/asm/kvm
13 matches
Mail list logo
