Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH] mark irq9 active high in DSDT

2010-10-31 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: On the last kvm conf call Anthony said that he'll be happy to include an updated seabios with qemu 0.13.1, so a new release would be appreciated. I branched and tagged rel-0.6.1.1. It only has 6d5a2172 cherry-picked into it. -Kevin

Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH] mark irq9 active high in DSDT

2010-10-27 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/25/2010 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: I'm okay with making tags and branches of seabios for bug fixes. So far qemu/kvm has just grabbed various builds of seabios - is it worthwhile to branch off of the seabios-0.6.1 version - which would mean qemu/kvm would pull in additional changes

Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH] mark irq9 active high in DSDT

2010-10-25 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/23/2010 04:12 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:07:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: How do we manage the stable series wrt this issue? qemu-kvm-0.12.5 has a regression within the stable series that this patch fixes. qemu 0.12.5 does not, but only because it does

Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH] mark irq9 active high in DSDT

2010-10-23 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:07:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: How do we manage the stable series wrt this issue? qemu-kvm-0.12.5 has a regression within the stable series that this patch fixes. qemu 0.12.5 does not, but only because it does not emulate polarity in the I/O APIC correctly.

Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH] mark irq9 active high in DSDT

2010-10-21 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/21/2010 04:00 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote: On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: In PIIX4 SCI (irq9) is active high. Seabios marks it so in interrupt override table, but some OSes (FreeBSD) require the same information to be present in DSDT too. Make it so.