David Abrahams wrote:
I'll try to reproduce this locally, right now I'm completely bewildered
by this.
FYI, if I listen to the radio in windows media player, I don't see the
effect. KVM will take 18% or so of the CPU even when not on a visible
workspace.
And since
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
Jeff Chua wrote:
On 4/22/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Significant cpu performance improvements (esp. for 32-bit guests on
64-bit hosts), as well as Windows 2000 support (without acpi).
Avi,
Ecountered the following error with
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 4:50 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
/*
+* Signal that we have transitioned back to host mode
+*/
+ spin_lock_irqsave(vcpu- irq.lock, irq_flags);
Christian Hesse wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
Jeff Chua wrote:
On 4/22/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Significant cpu performance improvements (esp. for 32-bit guests on
64-bit hosts), as well as Windows 2000 support (without acpi).
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 4:54 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
Adds an abstraction to the LAPIC logic so that we can later substitute it
for an in- kernel model.
This is
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
Christian Hesse wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
Jeff Chua wrote:
On 4/22/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Significant cpu performance improvements (esp. for 32-bit guests on
64-bit hosts), as well as Windows 2000
Christian Hesse wrote:
It may be the cpuid strangeness that Rusty saw. Can you try the
attached patch?
No, that does not help.
Ah, I see it. The Core processor does not have the STAR msr.
Can you try backing out the attached patch?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels,
Anthony Liguori wrote:
[updated patch]
Applied.
Hard to say exactly because of the noise. I did two runs of 4
test/vmexit:
Before 4091, 4194, 4559, 4439
After: 3979, 4324, 3918, 3910
So there's definitely a speedup, but probably only 100-200 cycles.
Running on an idle, headless
On 4/24/07, Christian Hesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2007, Avi Kivity wrote:
Christian Hesse wrote:
It may be the cpuid strangeness that Rusty saw. Can you try the
attached patch?
No, that does not help.
Ah, I see it. The Core processor does not have the
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
[updated patch]
Applied.
Hard to say exactly because of the noise. I did two runs of 4
test/vmexit:
Before 4091, 4194, 4559, 4439
After: 3979, 4324, 3918, 3910
So there's definitely a speedup, but probably only
10 matches
Mail list logo
