Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It would be very useful too to write vb->num_pages into the config space
>>> whenever it was updated. This way, the host can easily keep track of
>>> where the guest is at in terms of ballooning.
>>>
>>>
>> OTOH it's currently pretty obvious (an
Rusty Russell wrote:
> After discussions with Anthony Liguori, it seems that the virtio
> balloon can be made even simpler. Here's my attempt.
>
> Since the balloon requires Guest cooperation anyway, there seems
> little reason to force it to tell the Host when it wants to reuse a
> page. It can
Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> I think we need to go back to active low pci irqs, and to have
>> no-ioapic working we need to insert an inverter between the pci irq
>> links and the pic. I base this on the following:
>>
>> - piix doesn't contain an ioapic, so the actual lines must be active low
>> - th
Bugs item #1874203, was opened at 2008-01-18 00:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=893831&aid=1874203&group_id=180599
Please note that this message will contain a full copy
# HG changeset patch
# User Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
# Date 1200434310 21600
# Node ID 7fa5947a2da8c0c7424ebdcfaebcae624d6cf015
# Parent ee0c227fe3f6632f4b1b5fde3f7e05c8ea0a4378
Signed-off-by: Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-17 02:35:14]:
> - kvm probably doesn't work properly because I couldn't be bothered fixing
> the conflicts between git-kvm and the driver tree
>
Hi, Andrew,
The following changes got KVM up and running for me
This patch fixes the kvm build on 2.6
These patches create libcflat for PowerPC and allow testcases to communicate
with kvmctl via MMIO. They culminate in a C testcase that returns an error code
through kvmctl to the shell.
The x86 Makefiles looked hairy enough that I didn't want to mess with them, but
it should be fairly easy to conv
On Friday 18 January 2008 14:44:42 Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 02:38:03PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
> I was under the impression that the kernel API should be backwards
> compatible, so I consider this a bug. Is there anything I can do to
> help debug this issue?
> >>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 02:38:03PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote:
I was under the impression that the kernel API should be backwards
compatible, so I consider this a bug. Is there anything I can do to
help debug this issue?
>> It's a bit odd. I was certain that I had had it running with the
On Friday 18 January 2008 13:34:20 Soren Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:43:51AM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
> > > I was under the impression that the kernel API should be backwards
> > > compatible, so I consider this a bug. Is there anything I can do to
> > > help debug this issue?
>
> It's
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:43:51AM +0200, Dor Laor wrote:
> > I was under the impression that the kernel API should be backwards
> > compatible, so I consider this a bug. Is there anything I can do to
> > help debug this issue?
It's a bit odd. I was certain that I had had it running with the modul
11 matches
Mail list logo
