Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 3/5] ksm source code

* Izik Eidus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Just a bunch of nitpicks. > struct ksm *ksm; static > static int page_hash_size = 0; no need to initialize to zero > module_param(page_hash_size, int, 0); > MODULE_PARM_DESC(page_hash_size, "Hash table size for the pages checksum"); > > static int rmap

Re: [kvm-devel] pae guest on non-pae host?

Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > Quick question: is kvm able to handle guests using pae when the host > runs a non-pae 32bit kernel Yes. -- Any sufficiently difficult bug is indistinguishable from a feature. - This SF.net email

Re: [kvm-devel] Migration problems

Chris Lalancette wrote: > All, > I've been doing some migration testing of KVM guests, and have been > running > into some problems. Let me describe the setup and what I've tried, and maybe > somebody has some ideas about what might be going on here. > > Setup: > 2 identical Intel SDV b

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM and OS/2: #UD in real mode

Avi Kivity wrote: > H. Peter Anvin wrote: >> Just for fun, I tried to boot OS/2 Warp 4.0 under KVM (KVM-59 with the >> latest git kernel from Linus as of yesterday, slightly post >> 2.6.24-rc8.)I found that it crashes very early, apparently because >> KVM doesn't handle an #UD received in us

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Another maybe workable approach for Xen is to go through pv_ops > (although pte_clear doesn't go through pv_ops right now, so this would > be an additional hook too ...). > It does for 32-bit PAE. Making pte_clear uniform across all pagetable modes would be a nice clean

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] qemu: fix some warnings

Jan Kiszka wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > >> At this chance, can anyone comment on these uint32_t types? >> >> static int subpage_register (subpage_t *mmio, uint32_t start, uint32_t end, >> int memory); >> static void *subpage_init (target_phys_addr_t base, uint32_t *p

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM and OS/2: #UD in real mode

H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Just for fun, I tried to boot OS/2 Warp 4.0 under KVM (KVM-59 with the > latest git kernel from Linus as of yesterday, slightly post 2.6.24-rc8.) >I found that it crashes very early, apparently because KVM doesn't > handle an #UD received in user mode. It appears tha

[kvm-devel] [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable Virtual Processor Identification (VPID)

From 39551508c869f678f028655c062b3cb5fe4715bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sheng Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:14:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Enable Virtual Processor Identification (VPID) To allow TLB entries to be retained across VM entry and VM exit, the VMM can

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Another maybe workable approach for Xen is to go through pv_ops > (although pte_clear doesn't go through pv_ops right now, so this would > be an additional hook too ...). > I think that's the way. Xen is not a secondary mmu but rather a primary mmu with some magic chara

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > > >>> That won't work for kvm. If we have a hundred virtual machines, that means >>> 99 no-op notifications. >>> >> But 100 callouts holding spinlocks will not work for our implementation >> and even if the callouts are

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory merging driver for Linux

Chris Wright wrote: > * Izik Eidus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> this module find this identical data (pages) and merge them into one >> single page >> this new page is write protected so in any case the guest will try to >> write to it do_wp_page will duplicate the page >> > > What hap

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory merging driver for Linux

Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:05:53 +0200 > Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> i added 2 new functions to the kernel >> one: >> page_wrprotect() make the page as read only by setting the ptes point to >> it as read only. >> second: >> replace_page() - replace the pte map

Re: [kvm-devel] Enhance mmu notifiers to accomplish a lockless implementation (incomplete).

Expand the mmu_notifiers to allow for lockless callers. To accomplish this, the function receiving notifications needs to implement an rmap equivalent. The notification function is also responsible for tracking page dirty state. Version 2 brings with it __xip_unmap and do_wp_page so this is gett

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 16:17 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > Robin Holt wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > > >> Jumping in here, looks like this could develop into a direction useful > >> for Xen. > >> > >> Background: Xen has a mechanism called "grant tabl

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] KVM simplified virtio balloon driver

Here's the latest. Hope this works for everyone (putting in a oom handler or shrinker requires a lock, but can be done quite easily). Untested. === After discussions with Anthony Liguori, it seems that the virtio balloon can be made even simpler. Here's my attempt. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell

[kvm-devel] Enhance mmu notifiers to accomplish a lockless implementation (incomplete).

Expand the mmu_notifiers to allow for lockless callers. To accomplish this, the function receiving notifications needs to implement an rmap equivalent. The notification function is also responsible for tracking page dirty state. With this patch, I am getting fairly close to not needing the inval

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Make virtio modules GPL

On Thursday 03 January 2008 08:01:32 Anthony Liguori wrote: > The virtio modules do not advertise themselves as GPL but rely on exported > GPL symbols. This makes them unloadable as modules. > > This patch adds the appropriate MODULE_LICENSE(). Hmm, this is already at the bottom of virtio_blk and

Re: [kvm-devel] [Virtio-for-kvm] [PATCH 12/13] [Mostly resend] virtio additions

On Saturday 22 December 2007 02:27:04 Dor Laor wrote: > From 20a01e0c24f47e9805a88bebc9310163f99b5e99 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Dor Laor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:35:35 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Handle module unload Add the device release function. Hi Dor, It look

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory merging driver for Linux

* Izik Eidus ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > this module find this identical data (pages) and merge them into one > single page > this new page is write protected so in any case the guest will try to > write to it do_wp_page will duplicate the page What happens if you've merged more pages than you

[kvm-devel] Falling In Love with You

Sending You My Love http://89.110.13.74/ - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ ___

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I think it has yet to be demonstrated that doing the invalidate > _before_ clearing the linux pte is workable at all for > shadow-pte/RDMA. Infact even doing it _after_ still requires some form > of serialization but it's less obviously broken and per

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > You want to be able to tell the mmu_notifier that you want the flush > repeated without locks later? Sorry but then if you're always going to > set the bitflag unconditionally, why don't you simply implement a > second notifier in addition of my curre

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > [..] The linux instance with the > > secondary mmu must call back to the exporting machine in order to > > reinstantiate the page. PageExported is cleared in invalidate_page() so > > the other linux instance will be told that the page is not avai

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 11:48:43AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:52:47AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > > > But 100 callouts holding spinlocks will not work for our implementation > > > and even if the callouts are made

[kvm-devel] pae guest on non-pae host?

Hi, Quick question: is kvm able to handle guests using pae when the host runs a non-pae 32bit kernel? cheers, Gerd - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:52:47AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > > But 100 callouts holding spinlocks will not work for our implementation > > and even if the callouts are made with spinlocks released, we would very > > strongly prefer a single callout w

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008, Robin Holt wrote: > > That won't work for kvm. If we have a hundred virtual machines, that means > > 99 no-op notifications. > > But 100 callouts holding spinlocks will not work for our implementation > and even if the callouts are made with spinlocks released, we would very

[kvm-devel] Migration problems

All, I've been doing some migration testing of KVM guests, and have been running into some problems. Let me describe the setup and what I've tried, and maybe somebody has some ideas about what might be going on here. Setup: 2 identical Intel SDV boxes, Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6

[kvm-devel] [PATCH]: Make migration handle errors a little better

All, Attached is a fairly simple patch to the migration code to make it handle errors better. In particular, if the remote side wasn't set up properly (i.e. the memory size didn't match), the migration would fail, but the source host didn't actually react properly, so the migration would stil

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 2/5] add new exported function replace_page()

Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:10:50 +0200 > Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What prevents another CPU from freeing newpage while we run through > the start of replace_page() ? > > before calling to replace_page one have to call to get_page() and to do put_page()

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory merging driver for Linux

Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:05:10PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > >> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:05:53 +0200 >> Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> i added 2 new functions to the kernel >>> one: >>> page_wrprotect() make the page as read only by setting the pt

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 2/5] add new exported function replace_page()

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:10:50 +0200 Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What prevents another CPU from freeing newpage while we run through the start of replace_page() ? -- All rights reversed. - This SF.net email is s

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory merging driver for Linux

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:05:10PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:05:53 +0200 > Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i added 2 new functions to the kernel > > one: > > page_wrprotect() make the page as read only by setting the ptes point to > > it as read only. > > seco

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Like Avi said, Xen is dealing with the linux pte only, so there's no > racy smp page fault to serialize against. Perhaps we can add another > notifier for Xen though. > > But I think it's still not enough for Xen to have a method called > before the ptep_clear_flush: rmap

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/5] rmap: add new exported function: page_wrprotect()

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:09:29 +0200 Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Acked-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- All rights reversed. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 06:32:30AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > Christoph, Maybe you can clear one thing up. Was this proposal an > addition to or replacement of Andrea's? I assumed an addition. I am > going to try to restrict my responses to ones appropriate for that > assumption. It wasn't imme

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Memory merging driver for Linux

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:05:53 +0200 Izik Eidus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i added 2 new functions to the kernel > one: > page_wrprotect() make the page as read only by setting the ptes point to > it as read only. > second: > replace_page() - replace the pte mapping related to vm area between two

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-59 doesn't work

Izik Eidus wrote: >>> >> the bellow patch should fix this opss >> (it is targeted for 2.6.24-rc7) >> > sorry i forgat one break in this patch > this is the fixed patch. > Thanks, queued for 2.6.24. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:35:54PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Robin Holt wrote: > > We have a seg structure which is similar to some structure you probably > > have which describes the grant. One of the things hanging off that > > seg structure is essentially a page table containing PFNs with t

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Hi Kraxel, On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > That would render the notifies useless for Xen too. Xen needs to > intercept the actual pte clear and instead of just zapping it use the > hypercall to do the unmap and release the grant. I think it has yet to be demonst

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Robin Holt wrote: > We have a seg structure which is similar to some structure you probably > have which describes the grant. One of the things hanging off that > seg structure is essentially a page table containing PFNs with their > respective flags (XPMEM specific and not the same as the pfn fla

[kvm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio reset support

(One big patch, I'll merge it in properly later). A reset function solves three problems: 1) It allows us to renegotiate features, eg. if we want to upgrade a guest driver without rebooting the guest. 2) It gives us a clean way of shutting down virtqueues: after a reset, we know that the b

[kvm-devel] [PATCH 1/2] reset support: make net driver alloc/cleanup in probe and remove

Since we want to reset the device to remove them, this is simpler (device is reset for us on driver remove). Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 44 +--- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff -

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 03:12:36PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > >> That would render the notifies useless for Xen too. Xen needs to > >> intercept the actual pte clear and instead of just zapping it use the > >> hypercall to do the unmap and release the grant. > > > > We are tackling

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Robin Holt wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >> Jumping in here, looks like this could develop into a direction useful >> for Xen. >> >> Background: Xen has a mechanism called "grant tables" for page sharing. >> Guest #1 can issue a "grant" for another g

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] KVM: constify function pointer tables

Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Signed-off-by: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/kvm/kvm_main.c |4 ++-- Applied, but please generate patches against kvm.git as kvm moves quickly. In this case, the file has moved to virt/kvm/. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Hi, >> That would render the notifies useless for Xen too. Xen needs to >> intercept the actual pte clear and instead of just zapping it use the >> hypercall to do the unmap and release the grant. > > We are tackling that by having our own page table hanging off the > structure representing ou

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] explicitly use GNU awk for 'make sync'

Joerg Roedel wrote: > Change the Makefile in kernel/ to explicitly call GNU awk if its not the > default awk installed (like in Ubuntu). This fixes a build error seen on > Ubuntu > 7.10. > Applied, thanks. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-59 doesn't work

Le mercredi 23 janvier 2008 à 14:38 +0100, Laurent Vivier a écrit : > Le mercredi 23 janvier 2008 à 15:29 +0200, Izik Eidus a écrit : > > Izik Eidus wrote: > > > Andi Kleen wrote: > > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > >> > > >>> Andi Kleen wrote: > > >>> > > >

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-59 doesn't work

Le mercredi 23 janvier 2008 à 15:29 +0200, Izik Eidus a écrit : > Izik Eidus wrote: > > Andi Kleen wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > >> > >>> Andi Kleen wrote: > >>> > FWIW it seems things are broken even without -kernel in -59 too. If > I tr

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-59 doesn't work

Izik Eidus wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: FWIW it seems things are broken even without -kernel in -59 too. If I try to boot an existing image with just -hda ... the VGA screen just stays black while the process runs

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 01:51:23PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Jumping in here, looks like this could develop into a direction useful > for Xen. > > Background: Xen has a mechanism called "grant tables" for page sharing. > Guest #1 can issue a "grant" for another guest #2, which in turn then >

Re: [kvm-devel] kvm-59 doesn't work

Andi Kleen wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:56:52PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Andi Kleen wrote: FWIW it seems things are broken even without -kernel in -59 too. If I try to boot an existing image with just -hda ... the VGA screen just stays black while the process runs at 99% CPU. Again

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM oops in svm_vcpu_run with 2.6.24-rc7

Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2008 12:28:06 Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Andi Kleen wrote: >> >>> While starting a kernel >>> >>> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0008 RIP: >>> [] :kvm_amd:svm_vcpu_run+0x35/0x30d >>> >> Can you disassemble svm_

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM oops in svm_vcpu_run with 2.6.24-rc7

On Wednesday 23 January 2008 12:28:06 Avi Kivity wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > > While starting a kernel > > > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0008 RIP: > > [] :kvm_amd:svm_vcpu_run+0x35/0x30d > > Can you disassemble svm_vcpu_run() so we see where this ist Pretty

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Hi, Jumping in here, looks like this could develop into a direction useful for Xen. Background: Xen has a mechanism called "grant tables" for page sharing. Guest #1 can issue a "grant" for another guest #2, which in turn then can use that grant to map the page owned by guest #1 into its addre

Re: [kvm-devel] Test result for KVM60RC1

Zhao, Yunfeng wrote: >> >> And it's now fixed, kvm-userspace 76640d2815c628f23351e2c96c48c9e505e2d83e. >> > Quick fix again.:) We will retest it in next testing. > Will this fix affect performance of the guest? > > Hopefully not. Windows smp boots quickly, and I also ran a uniprocessor

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

> Why don't you stick to mm+va and use get_user_pages and let the VM do > the swapins etc...? Our concern is also with memory protections for the physical page. Additionally, we need to support exporting of memory in a VM_PFNMAP address ranges (specifically, memory mapped using sgi_fetchop, uncach

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Christoph, Maybe you can clear one thing up. Was this proposal an addition to or replacement of Andrea's? I assumed an addition. I am going to try to restrict my responses to ones appropriate for that assumption. > The remote instance is like a secondary TLB what you're doing in your > code is

Re: [kvm-devel] Test result for KVM60RC1

>-Original Message- >From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 2008年1月23日 19:40 >To: Zhao, Yunfeng >Cc: kvm-devel >Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] Test result for KVM60RC1 > >Avi Kivity wrote: >> Avi Kivity wrote: >> 3. With using qcow images xpsp2 with 2vpus may fail to boot >

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 04:52:47AM -0600, Robin Holt wrote: > But 100 callouts holding spinlocks will not work for our implementation > and even if the callouts are made with spinlocks released, we would very > strongly prefer a single callout which messages the range to the other > side. But you

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Hi Christoph, On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:53:12PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > First it makes me optimistic this can be merged sooner than later to > > see a second brand new implementation of this ;). > > Brand new? Well this is borrowing a

Re: [kvm-devel] Test result for KVM60RC1

Avi Kivity wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: > >>> 3. With using qcow images xpsp2 with 2vpus may fail to boot >>> >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1805017&group_id=180599&atid=893831 >>> >>>

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM oops in svm_vcpu_run with 2.6.24-rc7

Andi Kleen wrote: > While starting a kernel > > Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0008 RIP: > [] :kvm_amd:svm_vcpu_run+0x35/0x30d > Can you disassemble svm_vcpu_run() so we see where this is? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:27:57PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> The approach with the export notifier is page based not based on the >> mm_struct. We only need a single page count for a page that is exported to >> a number of remote instances of linux. The page count is dropped when all >> the remot

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] export notifier #1

Christoph Lameter wrote: > Ahhh. Good to hear. But we will still end in a situation where only > the remote ptes point to the page. Maybe the remote instance will dirty > the page at that point? > > When the spte is dropped, its dirty bit is transferred to the page. > >> sharing code, and fo

Re: [kvm-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/2] KVM: In-kernel PIT model

Yang, Sheng wrote: > On Tuesday 22 January 2008 21:54:10 Avi Kivity wrote: > >> Yang, Sheng wrote: >> >>> + >>> +/* Compute with 96 bit intermediate result: (a*b)/c */ >>> +static u64 muldiv64(u64 a, u32 b, u32 c) >>> >> Why do we need such high accuracy for the pit? >> > > The

[kvm-devel] [ANNOUNCE] kvm-60 release

I'd hoped to release the first version of virtio guest drivers with kvm-60, but that is delayed, and enough changes have accumulated. Most notable is virtio host support and Vista x64 on AMD hosts. Changes from kvm-59: - fix compilation with older kernels (Andi Kleen) - virtio host support (Ant

Re: [kvm-devel] Test result for KVM60RC1

Avi Kivity wrote: > >> 3. With using qcow images xpsp2 with 2vpus may fail to boot >> >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1805017&group_id=180599&atid=893831 >> >> >> >> >> >

Re: [kvm-devel] Test result for KVM60RC1

> >> 3. With using qcow images xpsp2 with 2vpus may fail to boot >> >> >https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?funcÞtail&aid05017&group_id059 >9&atid‰3831 >> >99&atid‰3831> >> > >I am working on a fix for this, but I

Re: [kvm-devel] Test result for KVM60RC1

Zhao, Yunfeng wrote: > > Hi, all, > > We did a test on KVM60RC1, and 7 issues have been found in the test. > > One issue fixed: > > 1. Fails to boot 64bit guest with 4BG mem --- Has already been fixed > by 29ae41a859a12aa71baacd35a9648511f335848e. > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&a

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] kvm memslot read-locking with mmu_lock

Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:38:49PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: >> Andrea Arcangeli wrote: This is arch independent code, I'm surprised mmu_lock is visible here? >>> The mmu_lock is arch independent as far as I can tell. Pretty much >>> like the mm->page_table_l