On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:42:30 +0100,
Cornelia Huck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Argh, please ignore. Was deep in something else and became confused.
Sorry about the noise.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsof
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:37:13 +0200,
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carsten Otte wrote:
> > This patch removes the include of "irq.h" in kvm_main.c, s390 does not
> > have irqs. For that, kvm_cpu_has_interrupt becomes an architecutre
> > specific function which can check for external or I/
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:37:38 +1000,
Rusty Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 00:18 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Monday 24 September 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > +
> > > +struct virtio_bus {
> > > + struct bus_type bus;
> > > + struct device dev;
> > > +};
> > > +
On Mon, 21 May 2007 13:28:03 +0200,
Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had the same discussion about PCI as virtual device abstraction
> recently when hpa made the suggestions to get a set of PCI device
> numbers registered for Linux.
(If you want to read it up, it's the thread at
h
On Mon, 21 May 2007 11:07:07 +0200,
Christian Borntraeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is quite easy with KVM. I like the approach that vmchannel has
> > taken. A simple PCI device. That gives you a discovery mechanism for
> > shared memory and an interrupt and then you can just implem
On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:51:27 +0200,
Carsten Otte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +static int priv_chsc(struct zlcpu *cpu)
> +{
> +
> + debug("cpu %d: channel subsystem call at %lx", cpu->cpuno,
> cl_get_psw(cpu).addr);
> + setcc(cpu, 3);
Actually, while this works for a Linux guest, this is
