I am still holding to few patches for big real mode. After rebase I will
push those patches.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Linux Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation
The Mind is like a parachute; it works much bett
>Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
>> Hi Avi,
>> I am noticing that with SL 10.1 The QEMU process memory consumption
>> steadily increases, up the the guest memory size and then the guest
dies
>> with unhandled vmexit. If I change the guest memory size I can see
the
>> qem
>-Original Message-
>From: Kamble, Nitin A
>Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 5:05 PM
>To: 'Avi Kivity'
>Cc: kvm-devel
>Subject: real mode emulation and memory consumption
>
>Hi Avi,
> I am noticing that with SL 10.1 The QEMU process memory consumption
Hi Avi,
I am noticing that with SL 10.1 The QEMU process memory consumption
steadily increases, up the the guest memory size and then the guest dies
with unhandled vmexit. If I change the guest memory size I can see the
qemu process dies accordingly, after reaching the size of allotted guest
memor
> Applied, thanks. We'll have to manage the interrupt window during
> emulation like we do while running native, so there's more work
> here.
I totally agree. So far I don't see any issue ignoring that aspect, so I
think no point in holding emulation patch at my end. More can be added
to the same
27;s open.
-Original Message-
From: Laurent Vivier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 12:24 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Correct management of REP prefix
Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> Hi Laurent,
> This p
r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 2:01 AM
To: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Laurent Vivier
Subject: [PATCH] Correct management of REP prefix
This patch corrects some errors appearing when we have an emulation
failure
on an operati
Hi Vivier, Avi,
In order to debug faulures in my tree, I was looking at the saved_eip
changes coming from your commit. I did not understand the use of
saved_eip properly. like why is it used in the emulation of the pop
instruction. Can you please help me understand it's usage?
commit 5d9b3
3, 2007 1:48 PM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: Avi Kivity; kvm-devel; Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] (big) real mode emulation - jump
conditional relative
Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> Hi Avi,
> Attached is the patch to implement instruction:
> jump conditional relative
like a parachute; it works much better when it's open.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 1:28 AM
To: Laurent Vivier
Cc: Kamble, Nitin A; kvm-devel
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] (big) real mode emulation - push imm8
The Mind is like a parachute; it works much better when it's open.
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 1:46 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: kvm-devel; Nakajima, Jun; Yu, Wilfred
Subject: Re: [Patch] (big) real mode emulation - emul
The patch attached to this email.
> Hi Avi,
>
> Attached is a patch implementing the instruction "ret" opcode 0xc3.
>
> Please Comment/Apply.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation.
-
T
Hi Avi,
Attached is a patch implementing the instruction "ret" opcode 0xc3.
Please Comment/Apply.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation.
-
The mind is like a parachute; it works much bet
Hi Avi,
Patch implementing the "pop reg", opcodes 0x58-0x5f attached. It has
passed the checkpatch.pl test. And you should not see any CRLF
characters in the attachment.
Please Comment/Apply.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation.
Hi Avi,
Attached is a small patch to emit little bit more information when
emulcation reaches cannot_emulate:.
The patch looks fine to the scripts/checkpatch.pl. It show not look to
you in the DOS format, unless something in between us is changing the
format of the attachment.
Please comment/ap
ntel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA
-Original Message-
From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 10:50 AM
To: Kamble, Nitin A
Cc: kvm-devel
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] implement pop reg in x86_emulate
Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 a
On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 20:52 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Kamble, Nitin A wrote:
> > Hi Avi,
> >I am in the middle of implementing the big real support in the
> KVM
> > now. I am trying to boot SuseLinux 10.1 on KVM, which uses extensive
> big
> > real mode
Hi Avi,
Please find a patch implementing the "ret" instruction in the
x86_emulation.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation.
-
The mind is like a parachute; it works much better wh
Hi Avi,
I am in the middle of implementing the big real support in the KVM
now. I am trying to boot SuseLinux 10.1 on KVM, which uses extensive big
real mode code in the boot loader. If you have any other targeted guests
using big real mode do let me know.
I have been working on my own priva
Hi Avi,
Attached is a small patch to let user land know where the guest was
at last vmexit. I am using this to debug the big real mode guests. I
think this will be useful to more people.
Author: Nitin A Kamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Co
Hi Avi,
I was playing with KVM while booting SuSE Linux 10.1 on it. And I found
it was bailing out with #SS fault. I root caused it to the address size
override opcode (0x67) from a mov instruction from the boot loader.
The attached patch handles the #SS(0) fault with emulation, letting
guest ca
Hi Guys,
I was wondering if SuSE Linux 10.1 and 10.2 can boot on top of KVM?
Xen is getting into real mode emulation issues with these distributions
for Fully virtualized Guests.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin
Open Source Technology Center, Intel Corporation.
22 matches
Mail list logo
