Part of the feedback we received from Fabrice about the KVM patches for QEMU
is that we should create a separate device for the in-kernel APIC to avoid
having lots of if (kvm_enabled()) within the APIC code that were difficult to
understand why there were needed.
This patch separates the in-kernel
Fixes issues with pit for PPC.
Acked-by: Jerone Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 13:54 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Part of the feedback we received from Fabrice about the KVM patches for QEMU
> is that we should create a separate device for the in-kernel APIC to avoid
> having
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Part of the feedback we received from Fabrice about the KVM patches for QEMU
> is that we should create a separate device for the in-kernel APIC to avoid
> having lots of if (kvm_enabled()) within the APIC code that were difficult to
> understand why there were needed.
>
>
Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> Please separate the code movement and changes into separate patches.
I'm not sure there's a great way to do this that preserves bisectability
and results in meaningful history. I could leave the #ifdef's in
i8254-kvm.c and then have a second patch that removes them. That
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> Please separate the code movement and changes into separate patches.
>
> I'm not sure there's a great way to do this that preserves
> bisectability and results in meaningful history. I could leave the
> #ifdef's in i8254-kvm.c and then have a seco
