Rusty Russell wrote:
Two versions, size *and* ret? This seems like overkill...
I think we ought to move away from version numbers and use feature
availability flags instead.
+ if (rc) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO paravirt KVM unavailable\n);
Double-printk when KVM
On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:11:16 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ if (wrmsr_safe(MSR_KVM_API_MAGIC, __pa(para_state), 0)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO KVM guest: WRMSR probe failed.\n);
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 12:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:11:16 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ if (wrmsr_safe(MSR_KVM_API_MAGIC, __pa(para_state), 0)) {
+ printk(KERN_INFO KVM guest:
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:11:16 Ingo Molnar wrote:
yeah. I suspect printing that it's executing in native mode is OK.
But only a single printk for that please
This will be taken care of in the next round of patches.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
-Andi
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
I think we should use the CPUID instruction (leaf 0x4000) to
detect
the hypervosor as we are doing in Xen.
Is that leaf
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Nakajima, Jun wrote:
What I can say is that we (including the H/W teams) reviewed it
internally.
I've switched to using CPUID. I noticed that Xen also uses
0x40001
so I'm presuming that that is okay too?
Yes.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Jun
---
Intel
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Subject: [PATCH] Add KVM paravirt_ops implementation
From: Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch adds the basic infrastructure for paravirtualizing a KVM guest.
Discovery of running under KVM is done by sharing a page of memory between
the guest and host
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
I think we should use the CPUID instruction (leaf 0x4000) to detect
the hypervosor as we are doing in Xen.
Jun
---
Intel Open Source Technology Center
-
This SF.net
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:52 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch adds the basic infrastructure for paravirtualizing a KVM
guest.
Hi Anthony!
Nice patch, comments below.
Discovery of running under KVM is done by sharing a page of memory
between
the guest and host (initially
Rusty Russell wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 09:52 -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This patch adds the basic infrastructure for paravirtualizing a KVM
guest.
Hi Anthony!
Nice patch, comments below.
Discovery of running under KVM is done by sharing a page of memory
between
10 matches
Mail list logo
