Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This patchset refactors KVM's paravirtualization support to better support
> guest SMP and cross platform migration. It also introduces a bare-bones KVM
> paravirt_ops implementation.
>
> I've tested this on VT and it works nicely. I'm having trouble getting a
> bzImage t
On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 20:49 +0300, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >I've tested this on VT and it works nicely.
>
> Excuse me, but you said several months ago something about "kvm-xen",
> which doesn't requires VT CPUs.
>
> Will you publish or merge that technology ? (as I don'
This patchset refactors KVM's paravirtualization support to better support
guest SMP and cross platform migration. It also introduces a bare-bones KVM
paravirt_ops implementation.
I've tested this on VT and it works nicely. I'm having trouble getting a
bzImage to boot on SVM so I haven't been ab
Anthony Liguori wrote:
>I've tested this on VT and it works nicely.
Excuse me, but you said several months ago something about "kvm-xen",
which doesn't requires VT CPUs.
Will you publish or merge that technology ? (as I don't have
VT-capable CPU at Home)
=
This patchset refactors KVM's paravirtualization support to better support
guest SMP and cross platform migration. It also introduces a bare-bones KVM
paravirt_ops implementation.
I've tested this on VT and it works nicely. I'm having trouble getting a
bzImage to boot on SVM so I haven't been ab
