Hi Anthony,
I found a bug in the last code: send_command() failed to copy back the
result into extboot_cmd structure. This patch fixes it.
I succesfully tested this version with guest Win2K (fully updated,
scsi boot) and Linux 2.6.25-rc8 (virtio).
Let me know if you can boot Windows with this
Nguyen Anh Quynh wrote:
Hi Anthony,
I found a bug in the last code: send_command() failed to copy back the
result into extboot_cmd structure. This patch fixes it.
I succesfully tested this version with guest Win2K (fully updated,
scsi boot) and Linux 2.6.25-rc8 (virtio).
Let me know if
Anthony Liguori wrote:
A couple general comments.
I'd feel a lot more comfortable with the int13 handler returning an
int and the asm stub code uses that result to determine how to set
CF. You set CF deep within the function stack and there's no
guarantee that GCC isn't going to stomp on
A couple general comments.
I'd feel a lot more comfortable with the int13 handler returning an int
and the asm stub code uses that result to determine how to set CF. You
set CF deep within the function stack and there's no guarantee that GCC
isn't going to stomp on it.
I also don't think we
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple general comments.
I'd feel a lot more comfortable with the int13 handler returning an int and
the asm stub code uses that result to determine how to set CF. You set CF
deep within the function stack and
