Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:12 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>
>> Why do you think it is better? I would have thought that vm86 is much
>> faster.
>>
>>
> I am seeing execution going to strange places in vm86 mode. That issue
> is not coming in the emulation.
>
>
That
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 13:12 -0700, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Why do you think it is better? I would have thought that vm86 is much
> faster.
>
I am seeing execution going to strange places in vm86 mode. That issue
is not coming in the emulation.
> I thought of doing it this way:
>
> - try to run nor
Nitin A Kamble wrote:
> Hi Avi,
>I was trying to avoid vm86 mode completely, by using emulation for
> all the real mode code emulation. It is doing better than vm86 mode,
Why do you think it is better? I would have thought that vm86 is much
faster.
I thought of doing it this way:
- try to
Hi Avi,
I was trying to avoid vm86 mode completely, by using emulation for
all the real mode code emulation. It is doing better than vm86 mode, but
I am seeing one issue with this approch.
The emulator is failing due to this code. Seems like the execution
need to go back to qemu to finish so
