Hello! A first-time poster (and user) is here... but not a newbie ;)
Some time ago I tried KVM for the first time, on an AMD X2-64 system
(BE-2400 processor, also tried with other similar processors, like
"plain" X2-64 4888+ etc), first with 2.6.23 vanilla kernel compiled
for 64 bits, SMP. After
Hello Michael,
On Friday 01 February 2008 13:30:03 Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Hello! A first-time poster (and user) is here... but not a newbie ;)
>
> Some time ago I tried KVM for the first time, on an AMD X2-64 system
> (BE-2400 processor, also tried with other similar processors, like
> "plain"
Amit Shah wrote:
> On Friday 01 February 2008 13:30:03 Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Some time ago I tried KVM for the first time, on an AMD X2-64 system
>> (BE-2400 processor, also tried with other similar processors, like
>> "plain" X2-64 4888+ etc), first with 2.6.23 vanilla kernel compiled
>> for
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
[]
>>> With 2.6.23 and vanilla kvm modules, while from X, it opens the
>>> "virtual console" (an X window), but that console is entirely
>>> empty (black), and nothing more happens. I can Ctrl+C the original
>>> process, but nothing more.
>>>
>>> With 2.6.
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
>
>> On Friday 01 February 2008 13:30:03 Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>>> With 2.6.23 and vanilla kvm modules, while from X, it opens the
>>> "virtual console" (an X window), but that console is entirely
>>> empty (black), and nothing more happens. I can Ctr
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> Ok, I finally got it working.
>
> The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and 32bits
> userland - not a single thought occured to me that this might be problematic
> of some sort. I was always trying 32bits kvm usermode tools with 64bits
> kernels.
On Monday 11 February 2008 12:58:07 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > On Sunday 10 February 2008 17:01:46 Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> Michael Tokarev wrote:
> >>> Ok, I finally got it working.
> >>>
> >>> The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and
> >>> 32bits userland -
Michael Tokarev wrote:
> I first tried 64bit HOST kernel and 32bit host userspace. It didn't matter
> what to use as guest - it doesn't even try to boot.
>
>
Okay. Fixed that bit for kvm-61.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
---
On Sunday 10 February 2008 17:01:46 Avi Kivity wrote:
> Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > Ok, I finally got it working.
> >
> > The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and
> > 32bits userland - not a single thought occured to me that this might be
> > problematic of some sort. I w
Amit Shah wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2008 17:01:46 Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, I finally got it working.
>>>
>>> The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and
>>> 32bits userland - not a single thought occured to me that this might be
>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
>> On Sunday 10 February 2008 17:01:46 Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>>
Ok, I finally got it working.
The problem was 32/64 bits issue. I'm so used to 64bits kernel and
32bits userland - not a single thought occure
11 matches
Mail list logo
