; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: PPC: e500: Move VCPU's MMUCFG register
> initialization earlier
>
>
> On 31.01.2013, at 15:56, Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008 wrote:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:a
2013 3:21 PM
> >> To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> >> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> >> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: PPC: e500: Move VCPU's MMUCFG register
> >> initialization earlier
> >>
ger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
>> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: PPC: e500: Move VCPU's MMUCFG register
>> initialization earlier
>>
>>
>> On 30.01.2013, at 14:29, Mihai Caraman wrote:
>>
>>> VCPU's MMUCFG register ini
> -Original Message-
> From: Alexander Graf [mailto:ag...@suse.de]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 3:21 PM
> To: Caraman Mihai Claudiu-B02008
> Cc: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org; k...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc-
> d...@lists.ozlabs.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] KVM: P
On 30.01.2013, at 14:29, Mihai Caraman wrote:
> VCPU's MMUCFG register initialization should not depend on KVM_CAP_SW_TLB
> ioctl call. Move it earlier into tlb initalization phase.
Quite the contrary. The fact that there is an mfspr() in e500_mmu.c already
tells us that the code is broken. The
VCPU's MMUCFG register initialization should not depend on KVM_CAP_SW_TLB
ioctl call. Move it earlier into tlb initalization phase.
Signed-off-by: Mihai Caraman
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/e500_mmu.c
