Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Fix GIC reg sizes for APM X-Gene

2015-02-26 Thread Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar
Hi Rob, On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:34 AM, Pranavkumar Sawargaonkar > wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Christoffer Dall >>> wrote: On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/18] arm/arm64: add smp support

2015-02-26 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 07:34:28PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > This series extends the kvm-unit-tests/arm[64] framework to support smp. > A break down of the patches is as follows > > 01-02: prepare general framework for smp use > 03-06: arm/arm64 fixups not 100% related to this series, >

tlbi va, vaa vs. val, vaal

2015-02-26 Thread Mario Smarduch
I noticed kernel tlbflush.h use tlbi va*, vaa* variants instead of val, vaal ones. Reading the manual D.5.7.2 it appears that va*, vaa* versions invalidate intermediate caching of translation structures. With stage2 enabled that may result in 20+ memory lookups for a 4 level page table walk. That'

Re: [PATCH v13 00/18] VFIO support for platform devices

2015-02-26 Thread Baptiste Reynal
Hi everyone, Are there any comments on this patch series? If not, Is there anything keeping this series from getting merged upstream? Thanks, Baptiste On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Baptiste Reynal < b.rey...@virtualopensystems.com> wrote: > This patch series aims to implement VFIO support fo

Re: [PATCH v13 00/18] VFIO support for platform devices

2015-02-26 Thread Marc Zyngier
Hi Baptiste, On 26/02/15 17:02, Baptiste Reynal wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Are there any comments on this patch series? If not, Is there > anything keeping this series from getting merged upstream? For a start, it looks like the dependency mentioned below is still not in, which is a bit of a prob

Re: [PATCH v13 00/18] VFIO support for platform devices

2015-02-26 Thread Alex Williamson
Hi Baptiste, On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 18:02 +0100, Baptiste Reynal wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Are there any comments on this patch series? If not, Is there anything > keeping this series from getting merged upstream? > > Thanks, > Baptiste > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Baptiste Reynal < > b.

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/18] arm/arm64: add smp support

2015-02-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 26/02/2015 14:50, Andrew Jones wrote: > Yes, this sucks, as we can't tell the difference between qemu failing > to run the test, and exiting with 1 vs. the test running, passing - > exiting with (0 << 1) | 1. It's too bad debugexit didn't set a higher > bit (like 5 or 6) to flag a "debug exit"

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/18] arm/arm64: add smp support

2015-02-26 Thread Andrew Jones
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:34:02PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 07:34:28PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > > This series extends the kvm-unit-tests/arm[64] framework to support smp. > > A break down of the patches is as follows > > > > 01-02: prepare general framework for

Re: [PATCH 1/6] target-arm: kvm: save/restore mp state

2015-02-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 25/02/2015 17:02, Alex Bennée wrote: > +#if defined CONFIG_KVM > +{ > +.name = "mp_state", > +.version_id = 0, > +.size = sizeof(uint32_t), > +.info = &vmstate_mpstate, > +.flags = VMS_SINGLE, > +.offset = 0, > +

Re: [PATCH 03/18] arm: fixups: add barriers, actually set MAIR

2015-02-26 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 07:34:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > Sprinkle in some more isbs after context-changing operations, > as the ARM ARM states we should. I haven't seen any problems > without them, but we should do it right. Also, *actually* set > the MAIR in asm_mmu_enable. We were reading,

Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 00/18] arm/arm64: add smp support

2015-02-26 Thread Christoffer Dall
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 07:34:28PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > This series extends the kvm-unit-tests/arm[64] framework to support smp. > A break down of the patches is as follows > > 01-02: prepare general framework for smp use > 03-06: arm/arm64 fixups not 100% related to this series, >

Re: stand-alone kvmtool

2015-02-26 Thread Alex Bennée
Andre Przywara writes: > Hi Will, > > On 18/02/15 15:50, Will Deacon wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> Thanks for doing this. Since it looks unlikely that kvmtool will ever be >> merged back into the kernel tree, it makes sense to cut the dependency >> in my opinion. >> > > P.S. Although both approac