Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Sophie Gautier
On 29/05/2013 23:07, Michael Bauer wrote: > +1 from me +1 from me too. Sophie > > Michael > > 29/05/2013 22:00, sgrìobh Martin Srebotnjak: >> There is one thing I miss from the OOo-Munich days - I am not sure how >> that >> was called - but every time a new feature or bigger change was >> introdu

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Andras Timar
Hi, On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Martin Srebotnjak wrote: > Adding "_" as an accelerator should have made programmers think about it: > changing same strings with accelerators from tilde to underscore made a lot > of manual work for translators of more than 100 languages - one changed UI > s

[libreoffice-l10n] Typo or wierd expression in instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/windows/msi_languages.po

2013-05-29 Thread Jihui Choi
Context:Control.ulf OOO_CONTROL_256 LngText.text Comments: PccFC "Choose which program features you want installed and where they will be installed. For example here you can select additional user interface languages and spelling dictionaries." => Choose which program features you want installed ?

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Michael Bauer
+1 from me Michael 29/05/2013 22:00, sgrìobh Martin Srebotnjak: There is one thing I miss from the OOo-Munich days - I am not sure how that was called - but every time a new feature or bigger change was introduced, there was a report/plan what it will mean, what needs to be done, how the UI wil

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Martin Srebotnjak
Hi, all, I see this as a recurring problem. Developers do some change in several files in many strings, because that seems appropriate and cleaner, and they do it: a) without thinking what that change will mean for translators b) knowing it will cause a lot of manual work for translators, but they

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Andras Timar
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > IMO, listing all three when only one is the actual marker would result > in more confusion than benefit. For example, the & character seems quite > common in English to me. Falsely marking it as an accelerator marker > would result in bad ind

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Pushing translations to pre-releases

2013-05-29 Thread Andras Timar
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Michael Bauer wrote: > I should know but it's been a while since I used the pre-releases to check > if the translation of a new feature looks ok but with the sidebar I decided > it was time - is there a rule of thumb of how long it takes for new > translations to s

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread F Wolff
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Andras Timar wrote: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: >> 2013-05-29 13:48, F Wolff rašė: >> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andras Timar wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Mihovil Stanic wrote: > > > I f

[libreoffice-l10n] Pushing translations to pre-releases

2013-05-29 Thread Michael Bauer
I should know but it's been a while since I used the pre-releases to check if the translation of a new feature looks ok but with the sidebar I decided it was time - is there a rule of thumb of how long it takes for new translations to show up or do I have to wait for a new pre-release version?

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2013.05.29 18:09, Andras Timar rašė: > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: >> 2013-05-29 13:48, F Wolff rašė: >> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andras Timar wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Mihovil Stanic wrote: > > I feel your pain. :) > I'm

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Andras Timar
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Michael Bauer wrote: > I might try that for some of the more prominent one - does Pootle allow > searching via keyid? > Yes it does, indexing of new files is still running (slowly). Andras -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Prob

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Andras Timar
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Rimas Kudelis wrote: > 2013-05-29 13:48, F Wolff rašė: > >> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andras Timar wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Mihovil Stanic >>> wrote: I feel your pain. :) I'm coming from Mozilla L10n in which you

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2013-05-29 13:48, F Wolff rašė: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andras Timar wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Mihovil Stanic wrote: I feel your pain. :) I'm coming from Mozilla L10n in which you have access keys as a separate strings to LO in which there is 3 different ways to mark

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread Michael Bauer
I might try that for some of the more prominent one - does Pootle allow searching via keyid? Thanks for suggesting. Michael 28/05/2013 13:55, sgrìobh Goran Rakic: This is not something I do, but it may be an option if you like to have perfect hotkeys. Open a dialog and make a screenshot. Nex

Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Hotkeys shmotkeys

2013-05-29 Thread F Wolff
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Andras Timar wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Mihovil Stanic > wrote: >> >> I feel your pain. :) >> I'm coming from Mozilla L10n in which you have access keys as a separate >> strings to LO in which there is 3 different ways to mark access keys. I'm >> no