Re: board report due

2008-03-11 Thread Erik Abele
On 12.03.2008, at 00:59, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Paul Smith wrote: I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been meaning to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a point where it might be worth considering exiting labs. I certai

Re: board report due

2008-03-11 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Paul Smith wrote: I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been meaning to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a point where it might be worth considering exiting labs. I certainly don't think Pinpoint is there yet, but I'm aiming that

Re: board report due

2008-03-11 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Paul Smith wrote: I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been meaning to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a point where it might be worth considering exiting labs. I certainly don't think Pinpoint is there yet, but I'm aiming that way, and I'm not sure I f

Re: board report due

2008-03-11 Thread Paul Smith
I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been meaning to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a point where it might be worth considering exiting labs. I certainly don't think Pinpoint is there yet, but I'm aiming that way, and I'm not sure I fully understan

board report due

2008-03-11 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
I'm inclined to say that there is not much to talk about that happened in labs and that the board should be concerned about. anything you guys want me to say that I might have missed? -- Stefano. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM