On 12.03.2008, at 00:59, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been
meaning to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a
point where it might be worth considering exiting labs. I
certai
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
Paul Smith wrote:
I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been meaning
to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a point where
it might be worth considering exiting labs. I certainly don't think
Pinpoint is there yet, but I'm aiming that
Paul Smith wrote:
I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been meaning
to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a point where it
might be worth considering exiting labs. I certainly don't think
Pinpoint is there yet, but I'm aiming that way, and I'm not sure I f
I'm not sure if this is board 'worthy' but one thing I've been meaning
to ask is what the process might be once a Lab gets to a point where
it might be worth considering exiting labs. I certainly don't think
Pinpoint is there yet, but I'm aiming that way, and I'm not sure I
fully understan
I'm inclined to say that there is not much to talk about that happened
in labs and that the board should be concerned about.
anything you guys want me to say that I might have missed?
--
Stefano.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EM