Re: Home for tiny, yet mature projects [WAS: Re: [orthrus] status]

2009-02-20 Thread J Aaron Farr
On Sat 21 Feb 2009 04:25, Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Maybe there are 3 committers to make a release, but after the release > the project is more or less mature because the codebase is very small. > Does this really justify to go TLP, just to make a release, make a > full-blown website, etc.? I do

Re: Home for tiny, yet mature projects [WAS: Re: [orthrus] status]

2009-02-20 Thread Bernd Fondermann
J Aaron Farr wrote: On Fri 20 Feb 2009 20:01, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: Honestly, I'm not sure if there's a good solution for something that's bigger than labs, but likely never large enough to escape the incubator. Of course, some TLPs are pretty small, so really as long as there were th

Re: Home for tiny, yet mature projects [WAS: Re: [orthrus] status]

2009-02-20 Thread J Aaron Farr
On Fri 20 Feb 2009 20:01, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> Honestly, I'm not sure if there's a good solution for something that's >> bigger than labs, but likely never large enough to escape the >> incubator. Of course, some TLPs are pretty small, so really as long as >> there were three commit

Re: Home for tiny, yet mature projects [WAS: Re: [orthrus] status]

2009-02-20 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On 2/20/09, J Aaron Farr wrote: > > On Thu 19 Feb 2009 01:12, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > >> I agree, we do suck at managing small projects... > > Because small projects don't need to be managed. > > The ASF is setup for development by peers, not single, small projects. > Our organization jus

Re: Home for tiny, yet mature projects [WAS: Re: [orthrus] status]

2009-02-20 Thread J Aaron Farr
On Thu 19 Feb 2009 01:12, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: > I agree, we do suck at managing small projects... Because small projects don't need to be managed. The ASF is setup for development by peers, not single, small projects. Our organization just doesn't "scale down" that way. Labs is the