On Sat 21 Feb 2009 04:25, Bernd Fondermann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Maybe there are 3 committers to make a release, but after the release
> the project is more or less mature because the codebase is very small.
> Does this really justify to go TLP, just to make a release, make a
> full-blown website, etc.? I don't think so.
If it's that mature, then just put a tarball up on your
people.apache.org site.
What is it that RAT, or these other projects need, that Labs doesn't
give you? releases? mailing lists? websites? If a project *really*
needs those things, then it's big enough for a TLP. If not, then can't
it just stay in Labs?
And what's really a release other than a tarball or an svn tag?
> Small projects with one or two contributors are a problem. Some live
> in symbiosis with some TLP, some are in labs, some struggle in
> incubation.
I agree. It's a difficult nut to crack. I've been trying to play
devil's advocate here a bit, seeing what the need really is and what we
can creatively do with what we already have setup.
--
J Aaron Farr jadetower.com [US] +1 724-964-4515
馮傑仁 cubiclemuses.com [HK] +852 8123-7905
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
