Hi all!!!
I think that the main Lab issue is strictly related to the fact that
releases are not allowed, so people prefer setting up a new
project/community outside, giving releases to users, then propose to
join the Incubator.
Take this just as my personal opinion: if, maybe, labs would allowed
on
Hi,
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> It has become pretty quiet here at Labs over the last months.
> How should we make Labs more popular?...
Labs are probably quiet because there's no real need for them - as
others say, experiments are more visible to the world at larg
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> On 27/05/2011 11:58, Ross Gardler wrote:
>>
>> On 27/05/2011 08:25, ant elder wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
>>> wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
> - provide
>> Changing this would mean changing the whole purpose of labs, it would no
>> longer be labs.
> "It would be worth revisiting why labs was created and ask have any of the
> motivations changed?"
>From the labs website - the bullet point i found most important:
"Apache Labs is a place for innova
On 27/05/2011 11:58, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 27/05/2011 08:25, ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, ant elder wrote:
...
- provide access to non-existing ASF people. Perhaps something like
as long as there is an ASF commit
On 27/05/2011 08:25, ant elder wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, ant elder wrote:
...
- provide access to non-existing ASF people. Perhaps something like
as long as there is an ASF committer initially creating the lab then
th
Gosh, that doesn't seem a very positive reception to change. Some
comments in line.
...ant
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
>> - support git. I'm not up to speed on the current state of play with
>> the ASF infrast
It would be worth revisiting why labs was created and ask have any of the
motivations changed?
Other hosting environments existed at that time.
There are sound legal and resource reasons why non-ASF people and releases are
not allowed.
As VP ComDev I am -1 on encouraging GSoCers to do their
I like these two:
>> - perhaps provide a really low overhead type of lab where you don't
>> need a vote to accept it, create doap files, or update websites etc,
>> more like just an svn sandbox to hold some code
when i outlined my json component, I was not sure how much work I
could put into it.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, ant elder wrote:
> - support git. I'm not up to speed on the current state of play with
> the ASF infrastructure git support but it sounded like it was starting
> to happen so labs could try to be one of the initial users
That's a discussion, which is completely
10 matches
Mail list logo
