On Aug 28, 2005, at 8:10, Ilske Thomsen wrote:
Haven't you read this:
Beads, wire and raised tallies are permitted,
I *have* :) Which is why, in response to Jacqui's warning about being
careful with Gros Point (NL), I created a whole series of *rhetorical*
situations where "natural bumps"
I think it is more a matter that the contest chairman is anticipating
having
to transport several of the entries in her suitcase and would prefer not
to
have long narrow three dimensional structures which would be very
difficult
to transport.
Surely entries which are mailed in would be sent d
In a message dated 8/28/2005 12:44:17 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just can't believe that that's what the Montreal group had in mind
(especially since there's no earthly reason for it; as several people
have said, the narrowness of the "table ribbon" means that w
Hello Tamara,
Haven't you read this:
Beads, wire and raised tallies are permitted,
Greetings
Ilske
-
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] containing the line:
unsubscribe lace [EMAIL PROTECTED] For help, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Proper" gimp in PG should be 6-8 times as thick as the "basic"
thread
> (I still take Ulrike Loehr-Voelcker as my "guru" on that ) -
that's
> a 3rd dimension right there, and that's without considering laces
like
> Polychrome, where even the *worker* is far thicker than the basic
> thread
On Aug 26, 2005, at 3:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jacquie) wrote:
I wrote to Debra to ask how strictly the 2D aspect of it will be
enforced [...]
She confirmed that 3D will be disqualified. Bear this in mind if you
do
Point de Gaze as those flowers often/usually have an extra 3D part.
I can't i