Re: [lace] amounts of thread

2011-09-16 Thread Marji Sakievich
er 16, 2011 8:10 AM Subject: Re: [lace] amounts of thread > Dear Sue and Ilse > > Now, I don't put too much on any more but rather add when required.  A very > small knot is hardly noticed in larger pieces. As a rule I put 4 times the length of the pricking, but still often d

Re: [lace] amounts of thread

2011-09-16 Thread Sue
I never put knots into the lace (only when having to tie off). I know the approx length of my arms outstretched and pull off using that measure x however many I think needed (or two thirds for smaller things), Lots of lace has multiple workers for diamonds, trails and things like that, but this

Re: [lace] amounts of thread

2011-09-16 Thread David C COLLYER
Dear Sue and Ilse Now, I don't put too much on any more but rather add when required. A very small knot is hardly noticed in larger pieces. As a rule I put 4 times the length of the pricking, but still often do too much. However, I would never knot an added thread - simply work double for a

[lace] Amounts of thread

2011-09-16 Thread Laceandbits
Ilse said "A very small knot is hardly noticed in larger pieces." And therein lies the difference between the common practice on the continent and the UK. We tend to double up the thread for a SHORT distance, rather than knotting. I say short because some people forget they are working wi

Re: [lace] amounts of thread

2011-09-16 Thread Ilse Depaepe
Dear Sue, When I first started, I filled up my bobbins completely. And now after many years I am still using up some of the threads. However, in the meantime, they have become more fragile and a bit dirty. And All my seizes have mixed together as well. Now, I don't put too much on any more but

[lace] amounts of thread

2011-09-16 Thread Sue
I know this comes up time and again, but I am currently preparing 42 pairs of bobbins to do a strip of lace and am unsure if I need put quite as much thread onto each pair as I am. Almost all of the lace in this piece is just torchon ground, with fans along both the edges (where I will obviously n