Re: [lace-chat] Re: Wallabies

2003-11-16 Thread dominique
David Collyer a fait jouer ses doigts de fée pour écrire à ÒRe: [lace- chat] Re: WallabiesÓ. [2003/11/15 15:53] > > If you like you can pop over here and check them out. There are some down > by the creek beyond my back yard right now. But they're not escapees - > probably been there for thou

Re: [lace-chat] Re: Wallabies

2003-11-16 Thread David Collyer
Dear Dominique, yup! ... as long as they squat because they don't move the same and jump much higher than rabbits .. so i was told ... i'll have to go to the zoo to have a look ... lol ... If you like you can pop over here and check them out. There are some down by the creek beyond my back yard

Re: [lace-chat] Re: Wallabies

2003-11-15 Thread dominique
Tamara P. Duvall a fait jouer ses doigts de fée pour écrire à Ò[lace-chat] Re: WallabiesÓ. [2003/11/14 03:09] > Well, they don't *differ* from kangaroos And, mistaking one for a > rabbit, in a French countryside (where one might expect to see a > rabbit, but not a pint-sized kangaroo) is n

Re: [lace-chat] Re: Wallabies

2003-11-13 Thread donlynn
Well the Wallabies in the forest of France has hit the local news. It was just shown as a highlighted story for tonight's edition. Perhaps they include a few of the now almost extinct species missing from the bush. I wonder if the Australian government would allow them to emigrate back to their

[lace-chat] Re: Wallabies

2003-11-13 Thread Tamara P. Duvall
All this talk about wallabies sighted here and there out of their "natural habitat", and I realised that I had no idea what they were like (except similiar to kangaroos)... Not what size they were, not how they differed from kangaroos. So, I went a-googling... :) Well, they don't *differ* f