Re: [Languagetool] compounds for Dutch

Then the translations might be: Koppeltekenprobleem Woorden die aaneen horen met koppeltekens, bijvoorbeeld 'zee-egel' i.p.v. 'zee egel'. Ruud On 09-11-12 19:53, Daniel Naber wrote: > On 09.11.2012, 19:37:53 Ruud Baars wrote: > >>> "Hyphenation problem" > A short error description used in LO/O

Re: [Languagetool] compounds for Dutch

On 09.11.2012, 19:37:53 Ruud Baars wrote: > > "Hyphenation problem" A short error description used in LO/OO's context menu > > "Hyphenated words, e.g., 'case-sensitive' instead of 'case > > sensitive'" The long description, used in the configuration dialog. Regards Daniel -- http://www.dani

Re: [Languagetool] compounds for Dutch

Daniel, thanks. I have a bit of a problem translating the texts, since the rules in Dutch for using hypens are strict as well as loose. We will see if the translations I added now are applicable in most cases. I really can not translate the last two. Could you specify in which case these texts

Re: [Languagetool] compounds for Dutch

On 08.11.2012, 09:32:28 Ruud Baars wrote: > Would anyone be willing to add the Java rule that uses compounds.txt for > Dutch, please? Done, could you send translations for these strings please? (They are in the source, not on transifex): "This word is normally spelled with hyphen." "This word

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

On 09.11.2012, 23:38:25 Nathan Wells wrote: > I just noticed this now - for the api is it possible to change Khmer to > km-KH instead of km-KM? Done. Could you try with the latest snapshot[1] to make sure it didn't break anything? Especially LibreOffice/OpenOffice integration? Regards Daniel

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

Ah - that was me..en_US :) I experimented with Khmer and then changed it back. Awesome - now it works! I just noticed this now - for the api is it possible to change Khmer to km-KH instead of km-KM? Though maybe in the future it would be best to have a drop-down list so it wouldn't matter... Th

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

On 09.11.2012, 17:25:02 gulp21 wrote: > 500 usually means that the lt server has encountered an error. Try to > run a lt server in a console window and see whether an error message > appears when trying to check a text. For those errors we also return a (plain text) body that describes the err

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

Here's what I get: Error: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Missing 'text' parameter at org.languagetool.server.LanguageToolHttpHandler.handle(LanguageToolHttpHandler.java:73) at com.sun.net.httpserver.Filter$Chain.doFilter(Filter.java:77) at sun.net.httpserver.AuthFilte

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

> I keep getting an "An error occured. Status code: 500" even though I > checked the box to use api.languagetool.org 500 usually means that the lt server has encountered an error. Try to run a lt server in a console window and see whether an error message appears wh

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

On 09.11.2012, 19:37:40 Nathan Wells wrote: > I keep getting an "An error occured. Status code: 500" even though I > checked the box to use api.languagetool.org Can you access http://api.languagetool.org:8081/ with a browser? Does it print a message that the text parameter is missing? Regards

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

On 09.11.2012, 13:20:51 Ruud Baars wrote: > What > kind of server capacity would be needed behind that. > I was thinking 'cloud-like'. We simply don't know because it hasn't been tested yet. It also depends on how popular the extension will become. Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.d

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

Very excited for this!! I keep getting an "An error occured. Status code: 500" even though I checked the box to use api.languagetool.org any idea why? Also, is occured spelled wrong? -Nathan On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Ruud Baars wrote: > That is exactly the reason of my question.

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

That is exactly the reason of my question. Suppose the link to become protected, and it leads to 1 address. What kind of server capacity would be needed behind that. I was thinking 'cloud-like'. Ruud On 09-11-12 12:59, gulp21 wrote: >> Both tools require or request a local server. > In the setti

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

> Both tools require or request a local server. In the settings of the Firefox extension, you can enable using the web service at api.languagetool.org, which can also be used for the grammar check extension for Thunderbird. The option is not enabled by default because the connection is not encr

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

Hi, Great job! It works fine. I have tested the extension in two kind of real-life situations: composing a message in gmail and using this new WYSIWYG Wikipedia editor.[1] What I miss now for this extension to be really useful is a more direct connection between the error messages and the points

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

Both tools require or request a local server. Is that caused by not having (scalable) capacity? Any idea what would be needed for a central server (farm). Ruud On 09-11-12 12:15, Daniel Naber wrote: > On 09.11.2012, 11:00:54 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: > >> What I would like to have would be a Thunde

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

On 09.11.2012, 11:00:54 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: > What I would like to have would be a Thunderbird extension, not Firefox. See https://addons.mozilla.org/de/thunderbird/addon/grammar-checker/?src=search Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de -

Re: [Languagetool] Firefox extension

Dear Markus, What I would like to have would be a Thunderbird extension, not Firefox. Could you do it for Thunderbird? Thanks! Kind regards, >Marco A.G.Pinto    ---