Good idea. This may be more attractive:
How you can improve LanguageTool
Consider adding it to the configuration/options dialog box.
Daniel Naber wrote thus at 08:28 PM 01-10-13:
>Hi,
>
>why should we only use the web to search for new LT contributors?
>So, I added a link to the results
I just restarted the same corpus check routine using the release version
wiht the changes disambiguation file.
We'll see.
About compilers, debuggers, that is too complex for me. I can do simple
scripts, but tend to hire people to get things like that done.
Ruud
On 01-10-13 21:18, Dominique Pe
Ruud Baars wrote:
> I retrace the steps with 2.3, and the error does not reproduce. It must
> be a snapshot thing.
>
> No matter, case closed.
>
> Ruud
Hopefully it's fixed indeed... or it's a rare multi-threading bug
and those are painful bugs to debug and reproduce. In fact
I just saw another
Daniel Naber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the French, Portuguese, and Italian websites still seem to contain the
> now outdated information that Java 6 should be used, would be nice if
> someone who speaks the language can update that.
>
> Regards
> Daniel
I've just updated the French page.
Regards
Domin
I retrace the steps with 2.3, and the error does not reproduce. It must
be a snapshot thing.
No matter, case closed.
Ruud
On 01-10-13 15:52, R.J. Baars wrote:
> No, that is all I changed, but with a (recent) snapshot.
>
> I will check tonight with the new release.
> - without the altered disam
Hello!
I have updated the page.
Sorry for so many commits of the same file, but the only way of
seeing how it would look like, was to commit and then check the
webpage.
Kind regards,
>Marco A.G.Pinto
---
On 2013-10-01 14:36, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:
> The same with the English site:
> Start LanguageTool [1] (>30 MB, requires Java 6 [2] or later, note:
> this is not the latest version of LanguageTool)
This is the link to the JNLP version, which is not up-to-date and thus
"Java 6" is actually corr
No, that is all I changed, but with a (recent) snapshot.
I will check tonight with the new release.
- without the altered disambig
- with it
It could be platform, But I am not the only one on (K)ubuntu, using JDK.
Ruud
> On 2013-09-30 18:17, Ruud Baars wrote:
>
>> For reproducing exactly: remov
Daniel,
I updated my SVN folder regarding the website to get the most
recent files, but it still mentions "Java 6 or later" in the
English version.
The same with the English site:
Start LanguageTool
(>30 MB, requires
Java 6 or
On 2013-09-30 18:40, Daniel Naber wrote:
> The release is not yet available on Maven Central, I'm working on that.
No progress so far. The problem is that the LT staging repo doesn't show
up in Nexus at oss.sonatype.org. There's already an issue for that at
https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/OS
Hi,
why should we only use the web to search for new LT contributors? So, I
added a link to the results of the stand-alone app, see attachment. Let
me know if you have ideas to improve that text. The text can be
translated, but still people will end up on an English page.
Regards
Daniel
--
On 2013-09-30 18:17, Ruud Baars wrote:
> For reproducing exactly: remove the line feeds from the sentence. They
> were introduced by the e-mail.
That and using your disambiguation file didn't help, I still cannot
reproduce the problem. Does it also happen with the 2.3 release? Did you
change so
Hi,
the French, Portuguese, and Italian websites still seem to contain the
now outdated information that Java 6 should be used, would be nice if
someone who speaks the language can update that.
Regards
Daniel
--
http://www.danielnaber.de
---
On 2013-10-01 10:33, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
> Also, I notice that Slovenian characters (č, š, ž ...) do not display
> properly on this site, unicode character codes are displayed instead.
This is fixed now, but it will probably happen again as long as
Transifex has those escape sequences, for
I guess that's not bad. We have Europe of two speeds and now we have
LT of two speeds :)
2013/10/1 Daniel Naber :
> On 2013-10-01 10:31, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
>
>> won't this keep those less well-maintained languages less
>> well-maintained because people will not see that LO supports their
>>
On 2013-10-01 10:31, Martin Srebotnjak wrote:
> won't this keep those less well-maintained languages less
> well-maintained because people will not see that LO supports their
> language at all and then they won't bother using and better
> maintaining their language?
Those languages are only one m
Also, I notice that Slovenian characters (č, š, ž ...) do not display
properly on this site, unicode character codes are displayed instead.
Also, when the Slovenian language site version is selected, the page
title in the tab is "English Skupnost LanguageTool", it should be
"Slovenska skupnost Lang
Hi,
won't this keep those less well-maintained languages less
well-maintained because people will not see that LO supports their
language at all and then they won't bother using and better
maintaining their language?
Lp, m.
2013/10/1 Daniel Naber :
> Hi,
>
> two small changes:
>
> * http://commun
Hi,
two small changes:
* http://community.languagetool.org now puts some less well-maintained
languages in a drop-down menu so the navigation is less cluttered
* The list of errors LT found in the Wikipedia now has a text "Error not
found? Too many false alarms? Make LanguageTool Better!" that
On 2013-09-30 18:40, Daniel Naber wrote:
> LanguageTool 2.3 has just been released.
With the new release, I have also added information about which
languages are looking for a new maintainer at
http://languagetool.org/languages/. I have contacted the maintainers of
those languages and asked th
Hey, thanks for the tip.
I've tried XML Tools for Notepad++. The auto-check seems to be buggy.
It complains where there's no fault.
Jan Schreiber wrote thus at 10:44 PM 30-09-13:
>My personal recommendation is PSPad with xmllint, a command-line
>validator for XML. Also, if you prefer Notepad++,
21 matches
Mail list logo
