Daniel Naber schrieb:
> BTW, what do you think about using CamelCase for the entities, e.g.
> "malenNomen" instead of "malennomen". I think this would improve
> readability.
I agree. Tbh, I never gave much thought to the entity names, because I
didn't expect the file to become so large over time,
On Samstag, 19. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> I got fairly close using
>
> It displays as expected in IE, but not in Firefox, and it doesn't pass
> testrules.bat.
I have reverted the change for now so the old workflow is in place again.
BTW, what do you think about using CamelCase for t
I got fairly close using
It displays as expected in IE, but not in Firefox, and it doesn't pass
testrules.bat.
Daniel Naber schrieb:
> On Samstag, 19. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
>
>> Not a bug, but a (major) annoyance for me: When grammar.xml is displayed
>> in a browser, the new externa
On Samstag, 19. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> Not a bug, but a (major) annoyance for me: When grammar.xml is displayed
> in a browser, the new external resources aren't embedded:
> http://languagetool.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/languagetool/trunk/JLangu
> ageTool/src/rules/de/grammar.xml ("Tipp
I just found this:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/03/14/trxml10.html
It looks as if it uses an XML-internal method. I'll try it and report
back how it works.
I wrote:
> Not a bug, but a (major) annoyance for me: When grammar.xml is displayed
> in a browser, the new external resources aren't embedd
Not a bug, but a (major) annoyance for me: When grammar.xml is displayed
in a browser, the new external resources aren't embedded:
http://languagetool.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/languagetool/trunk/JLanguageTool/src/rules/de/grammar.xml
("Tippfehler" is gone.)
I often use the browser view to make s
On Freitag, 18. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> Am I right that this method won't work out of the box, but requires
> changes to the Java code?
Yes. I have just committed this, moving only the typo rules to their own
file as a test. Does everything work for you? Java code will not need to be
t
Am I right that this method won't work out of the box, but requires
changes to the Java code? I tried it but the external files failed to load.
The only worry I have is that changes to the categories (like splitting
a category etc.) will be more complicated.
Daniel Naber wrote:
> grammar.xml conta
If I understand this properly, it is exactly what I have been looking
for. It would enable us to farm out those huge and cumbersome regExes to
another file until we have a method in place that allows us to get along
without them entirely.
Daniel Naber schrieb:
> Here's how the file could be split
On Donnerstag, 17. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> The largest grammar files are something around 1.2 MB afaik, I guess
> this is still in a range you can call normal today.
I do all my work, programming and XML editing, with the same application
(IDEA Intellij) and it doesn't work well with fi
Dominique, thanks for taking the trouble to test it, etc.
>From my POV, the upshot of the discussion *so far* is that we should not
split the grammar files, even though some of them are getting quite
large. Correct me if I'm wrong. For me (on a six years old cheap
computer), there is no problem to
Marcin:
> Classifying some of the words semantically might be really useful for
> some rules.
Indeed, I could not agree more. The most difficult part would be coming
up with the semantic categories in a way that is not completely ad hoc.
Everyone who has ever used a public library is probably awa
On Montag, 14. Mai 2012, Ruud Baars wrote:
> Don't bother converting the Dutch xml.
> I have already manually done that.
>
> Have to find the time to download the snapshot and get it tested.
Just send it when you're ready - I have applied the automatic conversion to
Dutch for now so I can remov
W dniu 2012-05-16 20:10, Jan Schreiber pisze:
> BTW, it should be possible to store at least those entities outside the
> file itself, but I don't know how. --Jan
Well, I had a look and it seems that you are using some of the entities
to define fairly long regular expressions (disjunctions). Thi
Jan Schreiber
> I know that ridiculously huge file is a bit of a problem
Are they? grammar.xml files are not that big.
A text editor opens the biggest grammar.xml in a blink on
my 5 years old laptop.
To make it easier to navigate when editing, I define folds in Vim
with a modeline (see comment
Second thoughts: otoh, the earlier we do it, the less work will it be. I
definitely agree that a file size of more than 1 MB is not very good.
I wrote:
> Daniel Naber wrote:
>> But what about splitting up that file into its categories? We could have
>> 5-10 smaller files rather than one large one
Daniel Naber wrote:
> Feel free to do that, although some new spaces might be re-introduced as I
> cannot set up my IDE for spaces/tabs on a per-project basis.
Then let's forget that. If there is one thing on earth that I can't
stand it's a mixture of spaces and tabs. It visually messes up
indent
On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> One tiny thing is still bugging me: Since the file is so long, the
> change in indentation (four spaces rather than two) results in a
> noticeable increase of the file size. We could avoid this by using tabs
> instead of spaces for indentation, tha
Daniel Naber wrote:
> I tried another conversion, please let me know if this is okay now.
>
> Regards
> Daniel
>
Everything seems okay now, thanks. I made a few trivial cosmetic changes
to the German grammar file though.
One tiny thing is still bugging me: Since the file is so long, the
chang
On Montag, 14. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> Daniel, the German grammar file is about one third larger now, probably
> because in the course of the automatic replacement the entities defined
> in the XML file itself (some of which are really huge, like "&sub...;")
I tried another conversion, p
Don't bother converting the Dutch xml.
I have already manually done that.
Have to find the time to download the snapshot and get it tested.
Ruud
On 14-05-12 20:19, Daniel Naber wrote:
> On Montag, 14. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
>
>> Daniel, the German grammar file is about one third larger n
On Montag, 14. Mai 2012, Jan Schreiber wrote:
> Daniel, the German grammar file is about one third larger now, probably
> because in the course of the automatic replacement the entities defined
> in the XML file itself (some of which are really huge, like "&sub...;")
> were replaced by their liter
Daniel, the German grammar file is about one third larger now, probably
because in the course of the automatic replacement the entities defined
in the XML file itself (some of which are really huge, like "&sub...;")
were replaced by their literal counterparts. This is quite unwelcome
because we def
23 matches
Mail list logo
