On Monday 15 April 2002 23:15, Omar Armas wrote:
I want to limit ftp bandwith to 128Kb. In a RH 7.2 box I have:
eth0: 200.39.186.1
eth1: 192.168.1.1
I use these rules:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000
tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:0 classid 10:1282
Stef Coene wrote:
On Monday 15 April 2002 23:15, Omar Armas wrote:
I want to limit ftp bandwith to 128Kb. In a RH 7.2 box I have:
eth0: 200.39.186.1
eth1: 192.168.1.1
I use these rules:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 10: cbq bandwidth 10Mbit avpkt 1000
tc class add dev eth0 parent 10:0
Bob Gustafson wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Bob Gustafson wrote:
What I would like to do is cleanly move packets out to the Internet over
two (maybe 3) separate interfaces, utilizing all of the bandwidth, and
avoiding snags.
[snip, lots of nice interesting wishes]
Does such a beast exist? Is
Mihai RUSU wrote:
I wont recommend the round robin packet load balancing as that would do
more problems with TCP connections, asymetric routing , RTT values.
I guess if you'd use multiple connections to the same ISP (and same
access point) that would solve the problems of different RTT
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Patrick McHardy wrote:
Mihai RUSU wrote:
I wont recommend the round robin packet load balancing as that would do
more problems with TCP connections, asymetric routing , RTT values.
I guess if you'd use multiple connections to the same ISP (and same
access point)
Hi.
I have set up several htb classes, attached filters to them,
and all seems to work right, but...
It seems, that fw classifiers have lower priority
in comparing with u32 ones.
So, in my current scenario it's optimal (as I think now)
to use both u32 and fw, but I wonder can I
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Dmytro Redchuk wrote:
Hi.
I have set up several htb classes, attached filters to them,
and all seems to work right, but...
It seems, that fw classifiers have lower priority
in comparing with u32 ones.
So, in my current scenario it's optimal (as I think
I have set up several htb classes, attached filters to them,
and all seems to work right, but...
It seems, that fw classifiers have lower priority
in comparing with u32 ones.
mh. I never noticed that.
So, in my current scenario it's optimal (as I think now)
to use both u32
Hi,
while testing HTB, I've found a problem with the U32 dport flag.
I'm not able to send traffic via the U32 dport filter with the rules
from the HTB manual while the same rules generated by the htb.init
script works fine.
The only difference I can see is that with the rules from the htb
I have been digging through the Lartc documentation as well as Netfilter,
etc. and haven't found much on per-connection routing for multiple
uplinks/providers.
What I would like to do is cleanly move packets out to the Internet over
two (maybe 3) separate interfaces, utilizing all of
hi all,
while compiling iproute2-2.4.7-now-ss010824 with kernel-2.4.18 i got the
following error ! ... i need ur help friends !
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-2.4.18/net/ipv4/netfilter'
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.18/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wno-trigraphs -O9
I have been digging through the Lartc documentation as well as Netfilter,
etc. and haven't found much on per-connection routing for multiple
uplinks/providers.
What I would like to do is cleanly move packets out to the Internet over
two (maybe 3) separate interfaces, utilizing all of
Bob Gustafson writes:
But, But, - this is really just software. We are not trying to cram wine
bottles down the internet pipe (although many would really like to do
that!).
The limitations I point out are inherent in tcp/ip. I think I sent a
proposal to this list describing a
Don Cohen writes:
Bob Gustafson writes:
But, But, - this is really just software. We are not trying to cram wine
bottles down the internet pipe (although many would really like to do
that!).
The limitations I point out are inherent in tcp/ip.
Yes, there are limitations in tcp/ip..
Does any one no how to block ICQ and MSN Instant messenger? I want to
block them using iptables
___
LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Hi,
Firstly I appologise for the cross-posting but as I got help from all
over the place I thought I had better feed back the results now I have
this working.
The Problem:
I run a Speedtouch ADSL modem on my router and host a number of services
behind my link (web server mainly) so people
This one Blocks AOL IM and ICQ
iptables -A FORWARD --dport 5190 -j REJECT
iptables -A FORWARD -d login.oscar.aol.com -j REJECT
--
This one Blocks MSN Messenger
iptables -A FORWARD -p TCP --dport 1863 -j REJECT
iptables -A FORWARD -d 64.4.13.0/24 -j REJECT
17 matches
Mail list logo
