Since some other constraints require me to still run 2.2 kernel.
(drivers for some hardware not working under 2.4)
I tried to control the ingress traffic with the ingress qdisc with no
success whatsoever.
I got 2.2.21 kernel and installed the ds8 patch to have the ingress
qdisc too.
Recompi
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-1] John Bäckstrand wrote:
[snip]
> 2) I would _want_ to traffic shape based on mac, not
> IP, but this doesnt seem possible. It isnt vital for me
> though, ip will work.
Actually, it is possible, using netfilter and fwmarks.
Netfilter can actually match based on M
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
> Arthur van Leeuwen wrote:
>
> >Unfortunately, in systems with identical cards that are configured using
> >plug-and-play methods such as those used by PCI random is the best shot you
> >have...
> >
> >
> 'Deterministic' is more accurate. It seems
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 06:17:10PM -0700, Adam B. Fineberg wrote:
> bert hubert wrote:
>
> >>From lwn.net:
> >
> >The current development kernel remains 2.5.24. Linus has not released any
> >kernels - or surfaced on the linux-kernel mailing list - since before OLS
> >and the Kernel Summit. Some p
bert hubert wrote:
>>From lwn.net:
>
>The current development kernel remains 2.5.24. Linus has not released any
>kernels - or surfaced on the linux-kernel mailing list - since before OLS
>and the Kernel Summit. Some patches are beginning to show up in his
>BitKeeper tree, however; they include so
Ive read up a bit on traffic shaping the last days, but
not only on linux TC, but also on dummynet and altq for
freebsd. My seemingly biggest problem is that I dont
want to specify manually every "class", but I want the
filtering to automatically regard each IP as a
different class. I might have m
Hello.
I would like to route broadcast messages.
For now, if I ping a.b.c.255 from m.n.o.w the packet is passing through
each router, except the last, a.b.c.1 (m.n.o.p, other "external" address)
and only he replys to that packet, but not from a.b.c.1, he does it from
m.n.o.p address (logic, it's
Arthur van Leeuwen wrote:
>Unfortunately, in systems with identical cards that are configured using
>plug-and-play methods such as those used by PCI random is the best shot you
>have...
>
>
'Deterministic' is more accurate. It seems to be random, on first boot.
But it will almost never change
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Telford wrote:
> I'm building routers. It's difficult to tell in advance which NIC will
> be assigned eth0 and which will assigned eth1 when using two NICs. Ping
> testing usually clears up this simple problem.
>
> The identification problem gets worse when adding a thi
I'm building routers. It's difficult to tell in advance which NIC will
be assigned eth0 and which will assigned eth1 when using two NICs. Ping
testing usually clears up this simple problem.
The identification problem gets worse when adding a third NIC, after
sorting out the first two NICs. Fre
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 11:44:32AM -0700, nitin panjwani wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have three Linux boxes running RH7.2 and each one of
> these has two 3com Ethernet NICs. I am trying to do
> some routing stuff with these.
>
> Ethernet interfaces on these boxes shut down by its
> own if I do not
Hi All,
I have three Linux boxes running RH7.2 and each one of
these has two 3com Ethernet NICs. I am trying to do
some routing stuff with these.
Ethernet interfaces on these boxes shut down by its
own if I do not pass the packet through them for a
while. I am not able to understand why is it
bert hubert wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:02:40PM +0800, Patrick Chan wrote:
>
>
>>There is priority queueing in Cisco router.
>>
>>
>Please dig up a link so we can see what 'priority queueing' actually *is*.
>But I bet that tc has it.
>
>
I can almost guarantee Patrick is asking ab
Iptraf shows by interface. However, we cannot see traffic per flowid
which is what I guess is needed. I've been hunting for one myself. Staf
has promised a good working version using rrd on a stable basis shortly.
Right Staf?
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAI
Hi List,
Sorry if my question sounds naive and/or repeated.
But, is it safe to use htb in a real environment, with
about 150 customers sharing a 2 Mbps link, and with
bandwidth restriction applied to each ip?
I'm currently using cbq, and its not giving ne problems so far
(except a slight headach
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 04:17:39AM -, ganesh kumar godavari wrote:
> server in the private subnet. However, the server seems to be able
> to finish the tcp handshake with the real player. The last
>
> successful connection is the sever sending the client [FIN, ACK].
> After that, nothing h
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 12:02:40PM +0800, Patrick Chan wrote:
> There is priority queueing in Cisco router.
>
> Is there any equivalent implementation for TC on Linux?
>
> If yes, how can I configure and can you give me example?
Please dig up a link so we can see what 'priority queueing' actual
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:53:38AM +0100, A. Peter Mee wrote:
> I am attempting to implement the SYN flood protection scheme as presented in
> LARTC. Unfortunately, when I attempt `tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle :
> ingress` I get the error:
>
> RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
I
Hi all,
(My apologies if this appears to be a repost - my mail yesterday does not
appear to have got to the list.)
I am attempting to implement the SYN flood protection scheme as presented in
LARTC. Unfortunately, when I attempt `tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle :
ingress` I get the error:
RTN
19 matches
Mail list logo
