I would like to check it out but The download link is
not working, can be clicked !!!
- Original Message -
From: "Stef Coene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:37 AM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] tools for traffic monitoring
> I
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Chris Wilson wrote:
My proposed solution is a new Netfilter table which packets pass
through
on their way out to a device.There would be just a single terminal
target,
CLASSIFY, which would enqueue the packet in the specified classifier.
Unclas
Patrick McHardy wrote:
Chris Wilson wrote:
My proposed solution is a new Netfilter table which packets pass through
on their way out to a device.There would be just a single terminal
target,
CLASSIFY, which would enqueue the packet in the specified classifier.
Unclassified packets which drop
David DeLauro wrote:
[Filtering Gnutella/Kazaa on port 80]
From reading the archives... it seems there is a iptables type solution (I
built the iptables/nat+bridging patch into the kernel) but I haven't had
any luck in finding it let alone another solution using tc/match filters.
You need a ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 25 January 2003 00:23, David DeLauro wrote:
> For some of my machines Kazaa or the GNUTELLA protocol is running itself
> on port 80. Is there any way to filter the GNUTELLA traffic into my bulk
> traffic class ("all the rest") even if GN
I've just recently setup a linux bridge that is doing some traffic
shaping/policing using HTB/SFQ for a small college network. Everything
is working great!!! but I've recently discovered something that seems to
break my filter/shaping scheme.
I have 4 classes one for unrestricted bandwidth usage
hi stef,
> Reserving bandwidth for something is not so difficult. If you have a 100kbps
> link and you want a minimum of 10kbps for cs, you have to create 2 class :
[...]
> The 10kbps class will always get at least 10kbps. If it's a low rate class,
> you can even limit the 90kbps to 90kbps. S
On Friday 24 January 2003 21:21, Sebastian 'spax' Pape wrote:
> hi there,
>
> > > i've isolated a band of 5k for one of my friends in the network so he
> > > can play counter-strike .. if i don't use the isolated parameter he
> > > will have a bad ping since his class will borrow to another classes
hi there,
> > i've isolated a band of 5k for one of my friends in the network so he can
> > play counter-strike .. if i don't use the isolated parameter he will have a
> > bad ping since his class will borrow to another classes ..
> Can you post your script so I can take a look at it ?
I tried to
On Friday 24 January 2003 19:57, Daniel Ditu wrote:
> i've isolated a band of 5k for one of my friends in the network so he can
> play counter-strike .. if i don't use the isolated parameter he will have a
> bad ping since his class will borrow to another classes ..
I tried it a few times (you can
i've isolated a band of 5k for one of my friends in
the network so he can play counter-strike .. if i don't use the isolated
parameter he will have a bad ping since his class will borrow to another classes
..
Hello,
> I thank your comments... We are WISP from just two years... we
> use AP Lucent
> Orinoco.. In the begining we use Karlnet software but now we are in mode
> 802.11b. That change make us see the way to limit the bandwidth... We are
> using channel 1 with an omni for an PMtP and channel 6 and
On Friday 24 January 2003 16:16, ray-nger wrote:
> Hello!
> Could you tell me some answers about subj?
> Isolated class will not lend out bandwidth.
> sharing - will always lend out?
> not isol. non sharing - ?
>
> The same for bounded/borrow:
> bounded - will not borrow.
> not bound not borro
Chris Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
Having built a fairly complex QoS system I can now see that there are a
number of places where I feel that QoS in Linux could and should be
improved. The MD of my company, NetServers.co.uk, has generously agreed in
principle to sponsor this work if there is communit
On Friday 24 January 2003 10:43, Simon Stemplinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am using the wondershaper script on a DSL-router-firewall combination
> for several LAN clients. My Problem is that the port based filter rules
> dont match bulk traffic satisfyingly, because many file sharing programs
> allow to
I figure it should be
tc filter add dev $DEV parent 1: protocol ip prio 10 u32 \
match ip protocol 6 0xff \
match u8 0x05 0x0f at 0 \
match u8 0x04 0x04 at 2 \
match u8 0x10 0xff at 33 \
flowid 1:30
but it doesn´t work... what am I doing wrong?
regards,
Simon
Simon Stemplinger wrote:
Hi
On Thursday 23 January 2003 20:22, Mihai RUSU wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Stef Coene wrote:
> > If it works, fine for you. It's just not something I would advice :)
> > But why not delete the root qdisc and recreate it?
> >
> > Stef
>
> All started when we observed that in the meantime (the time
On Friday 24 January 2003 02:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would be glad if someone could point me where can I get the traffic
> data on Linux, preferrably on the '/proc' file system. Studying data
> based on a device in total is not sufficient for me.
>
> I would like to do a measurement of the
hi, I've encrountred some problem with iproute2...
I'm building a router with kernel 2.4.20 but my script fail when I try to do
a load balancing over a specific traffic, how explained on LARTC for
balance the access between more link we should simple:
ip route add default scope global nexthop via
Hi all,
Having built a fairly complex QoS system I can now see that there are a
number of places where I feel that QoS in Linux could and should be
improved. The MD of my company, NetServers.co.uk, has generously agreed in
principle to sponsor this work if there is community interest and agreeme
Robert:
I thank your comments... We are WISP from just two years... we use AP Lucent
Orinoco.. In the begining we use Karlnet software but now we are in mode
802.11b. That change make us see the way to limit the bandwidth... We are
using channel 1 with an omni for an PMtP and channel 6 and 11 with
Hello!
Could you tell me some answers about subj?
Isolated class will not lend out bandwidth.
sharing - will always lend out?
not isol. non sharing - ?
The same for bounded/borrow:
bounded - will not borrow.
not bound not borrow - ???
Or example:
We have 2 class. Class 1st take Xkbit, and m
I've noticed some recent posting on controlling
traffic
congestion, and so I thought I'd update anyone on this
list who might be interested in what has happenned
with
the Linux Bandwidth Arbitrator www.apconnections.net
over the last couple of months.
I am starting a serious beta trail with state
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mihai RUSU wrote:
| After the oops applications that were trying to write to the /var (xfs)
| partition were hanging in D state. We will reformat it and reboot with a
| vanilla 2.4.20 having the same config except the XFS filesystem.
I don't know if i
Hello
After 4 days of uptime the new 2.4.20 kernel with HTB3 (previously we used
HTB2 and 2.4.9-31) oopsed and in short time I could not even ssh to the
system. Here is the ksymoops filtered message:
ksymoops 2.4.8 on i686 2.4.20-xfs. Options used
-V (default)
-k /proc/ksyms (default)
Hi,
i am using the wondershaper script on a DSL-router-firewall combination
for several LAN clients. My Problem is that the port based filter rules
dont match bulk traffic satisfyingly, because many file sharing programs
allow to use custom ports. Usually a few connections that is not
recogniz
Hello
> We are ISP and we give Internet Wireless Outdoor Service . The
> Base Station
> works in 802.11b and it is connected with a Linux Mandrake Server
> that make
> NAT.
802.11b devices are by design experiencing "hidden node" effect.
>
> Besides the linux Server limit the bandwidth of each Wire
27 matches
Mail list logo
