Re: [LARTC] DDNS service

2003-02-20 Thread Victor Cassar
Martin .. Wrote >T'ain't a LARTC question, but I use dyndns.org. >Apparently, so does Stef. oops, sorry for that, it will not hapen again Thanks for the response Victor Cassar __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, mor

Re: [LARTC] DDNS service

2003-02-20 Thread Martin A. Brown
T'ain't a LARTC question, but I use dyndns.org. Apparently, so does Stef. That's two votes (if you don't mind my voting for you, Stef!). -Martin : I´m looking for some public DDNS service provider free or paid one, : with good reputation : : any recomendation or related comment will be aprec

[LARTC] DDNS service

2003-02-20 Thread Victor Cassar
Hi: I´m looking for some public DDNS service provider free or paid one, with good reputation any recomendation or related comment will be apreciated i want to use it with my dsl modem (the modem has it´s own ddns client) Thanks In advance Victor Cassar

Re: [LARTC] Test tool - traffic generator.

2003-02-20 Thread N N Ashok
On Thursday 20 February 2003 15:44, Bartek Krajnik wrote: > On 20-02-2003 at 05:47:07PM +0200, Emmanuel Guiton wrote: > EG> Hi! > EG> > EG> Does anyone know a good traffic generator that can be implemented on > the EG> same machine than the one which implement traffic control? > EG> I have a "test

Re: [LARTC] Test tool - traffic generator.

2003-02-20 Thread N N Ashok
On Thursday 20 February 2003 15:44, Bartek Krajnik wrote: > On 20-02-2003 at 05:47:07PM +0200, Emmanuel Guiton wrote: > EG> Hi! > EG> > EG> Does anyone know a good traffic generator that can be implemented on > the EG> same machine than the one which implement traffic control? > EG> I have a "test

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread Brad Davidson
Kirby C. Bohling said: > I'm guessing it has two interfaces. Hence the sentence: > >> > Yes, but not in sense that traffic comes in one interface and goes >> out another The fact that it does NOT come in one interface and go out another implies to me that there's only one interface. If there's tw

Re: [LARTC] Suggestions welcome

2003-02-20 Thread Bartek Krajnik
On 20-02-2003 at 08:39:32AM -0800, Jeff Nye wrote: JN> I have a network laid out as follows. JN> JN> The Network JN> JN> JN> -- Eth0 - INTERNET x.x.x.x JN> LINUX | JN> Router1 | Eth2 - LAN 172.16.1.x JN> | JN> -- Eth1 -Bridge 1a 192.168.1.1 JN> | JN> | JN>

Re: [LARTC] real time tc graphs

2003-02-20 Thread Stef Coene
On Thursday 20 February 2003 21:21, Bartek Krajnik wrote: > On 20-02-2003 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Stef Coene wrote: > SC> I adedd my internal web-server name in the html page. > SC> http://geuze/blablabla > SC> I think I dronk too much beer :) > SC> I corrected it. Can you try again ? > SC> > I think

Re: [LARTC] Test tool - traffic generator.

2003-02-20 Thread Bartek Krajnik
On 20-02-2003 at 05:47:07PM +0200, Emmanuel Guiton wrote: EG> Hi! EG> EG> Does anyone know a good traffic generator that can be implemented on the EG> same machine than the one which implement traffic control? EG> I have a "test network" (2 hosts). One of the machines is a router on EG> which I

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread Kirby C. Bohling
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 14:24, Brad Davidson wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. said: > > > Yes, but not in sense that traffic comes in one interface and goes out > > another. From my understanding the main benefit of the SysMaster > > solution was the number of connections being balanced had nothing t

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread Brad Davidson
William L. Thomson Jr. said: > Yes, but not in sense that traffic comes in one interface and goes out > another. From my understanding the main benefit of the SysMaster > solution was the number of connections being balanced had nothing to do > with the number of interfaces. ... so it would go in

Re: [LARTC] real time tc graphs

2003-02-20 Thread Bartek Krajnik
On 20-02-2003 at 07:55:11PM +0100, Stef Coene wrote: SC> I adedd my internal web-server name in the html page. SC> http://geuze/blablabla SC> I think I dronk too much beer :) SC> I corrected it. Can you try again ? SC> I think that I said this before at my home... never mind. Maybe I found next

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Brad, On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 10:36, Brad Davidson wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. said: > >From what I was being told at the time, over a year ago. You plug it > > into your network. Configure all machines to use it as their gateway. It > > will then make decisions regarding the next gateway or hop

Re: [LARTC] real time tc graphs

2003-02-20 Thread Stef Coene
On Thursday 20 February 2003 00:33, Andrew Hall wrote: > What version of and brand of JVM are you using with IE, because I'm running > sun's sdk 1.4.1-01 and it doesn't find the CounterScroll.class. Argh ('|@"!è(§ I adedd my internal web-server name in the html page. http://geuze/blablabla I think

[LARTC] traffic generator for linux

2003-02-20 Thread Victor Cassar
Thanks Stef __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ___ LARTC mailing list / [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: htt

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread Brad Davidson
William L. Thomson Jr. said: >From what I was being told at the time, over a year ago. You plug it > into your network. Configure all machines to use it as their gateway. It > will then make decisions regarding the next gateway or hop to use. So it replaces the Default Gateway. The traffic is pret

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Brad, On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 09:31, Brad Davidson wrote: > How is this possible? Is just goes out on the network and sucks up overlimit > traffic, preventing it from getting to the destination? >From what I was being told at the time, over a year ago. You plug it into your network. Configure all m

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread John Bäckstrand
It almost sounds like those "boxes" does ARP spoofing to prevent having to do any network setup changes to me, meaning traffic would actually flow through them. Sounds pretty stupid though, could have all sorts of ill effects, depending on the nature of the network. > How is this possible? Is just

Re: [LARTC] Test tool - traffic generator.

2003-02-20 Thread Stef Coene
On Thursday 20 February 2003 17:40, Emmanuel Guiton wrote: > >Have you tried netperf ? > >Search on google if you have not heard of it. > > Thanks, however it seems that it does not fit with my needs. Netperf > works with client/server mode while I just need a tool capable of > sending traffic on t

Re: [LARTC] traffic generator for linux

2003-02-20 Thread Stef Coene
On Thursday 20 February 2003 18:23, Victor Cassar wrote: > Hi > > I would like to use a traffic generator to > test my shapping > > are there any free ? http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/setup/tg.html Oops :) I posted the wrong url. Stef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Using Linux as bandwidth m

Re: [LARTC] traffic generator for linux

2003-02-20 Thread Stef Coene
On Thursday 20 February 2003 18:23, Victor Cassar wrote: > Hi > > I would like to use a traffic generator to > test my shapping > > are there any free ? http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1001470&aid=1 Sef -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.d

Re: [LARTC] Commercial Alternatives

2003-02-20 Thread Brad Davidson
How is this possible? Is just goes out on the network and sucks up overlimit traffic, preventing it from getting to the destination? I'm pretty sure that all the products out there require the traffic to pass through them to perform the shaping, unless there's some deep voodoo out there that I'm n

[LARTC] traffic generator for linux

2003-02-20 Thread Victor Cassar
Hi I would like to use a traffic generator to test my shapping are there any free ? Regards __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ ___ LARTC mailing

Re: [LARTC] Test tool - traffic generator.

2003-02-20 Thread Emmanuel Guiton
Have you tried netperf ? Search on google if you have not heard of it. Thanks, however it seems that it does not fit with my needs. Netperf works with client/server mode while I just need a tool capable of sending traffic on the network (and particularly to non-existent machines :) ) and wi

[LARTC] Suggestions welcome

2003-02-20 Thread Jeff Nye
I have a network laid out as follows. The Network -- Eth0 - INTERNET x.x.x.x LINUX | Router1 | Eth2 - LAN 172.16.1.x | -- Eth1 -Bridge 1a 192.168.1.1 | | -- Eth0 - Bridge 1b 192.168.1.2 LINUX | Router2 | Eth2 - LAN 172.16.2.x |

Re: [LARTC] limiting users on a 128kbit line

2003-02-20 Thread Mathieu Deziel
Radus, see below. Mathieu. radus wrote: > > I made priorities only for the big class where the default traffic goes, so > that the remaining 5 computers share the bandwidth equally (when it's free) > I should write prios for all classes ? > Priorities to the filter means which filter is tried fi

[LARTC] Test tool - traffic generator.

2003-02-20 Thread Emmanuel Guiton
Hi! Does anyone know a good traffic generator that can be implemented on the same machine than the one which implement traffic control? I have a "test network" (2 hosts). One of the machines is a router on which I want to test my traffic control settings. This router is supposed to be at the in

Re: [LARTC] Filter prio vs class prio

2003-02-20 Thread Stephane Ouellette
Kalle Rune wrote: Hi all; Could any tell me the difference between attaching a filter with priority or a class with priority. Have I understand this right when I say: You can attach to or more filter to any qdisc or c

Re: [LARTC] teql question

2003-02-20 Thread Bartek Krajnik
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Hello! > Is it possible to create more than one teql device ? If yes how to > do it ? Insert another sch_teql module under a different name. This will create device teql1 and so on. Alexey - End forwarded message - msg04125/pgp0

[LARTC] Filter prio vs class prio

2003-02-20 Thread Kalle Rune
Hi all; Could any tell me the difference between attaching a filter with priority or a class with priority. Have I understand this right when I say: You can attach to or more filter to any qdisc or class. Filter witch

Re: [LARTC] limiting users on a 128kbit line

2003-02-20 Thread radus
Hello! First, thanks for the reply... > > 5 computers that get dedicated bandwidth and the rest go in a pool with > > bigger priorities. > > I do not see the priorities in your script. Only some of the filters have > priorities, but it has nothing to do with scheduling (you should give > prioirti

Re: [LARTC] limiting users on a 128kbit linw

2003-02-20 Thread Mathieu Deziel
Radus, see below. > > I've been trying to write a traffic shaper for a 128kbit line with this setup > : > 5 computers that get dedicated bandwidth and the rest go in a pool with bigger > priorities. > I do not see the priorities in your script. Only some of the filters have priorities, but it

[LARTC] webbase monitor

2003-02-20 Thread Vikas Agarwal
I have installed linux 7.1 with two lan card and i have attached three machine in this server and net is working fine . Now i am looking any software which help to monitor this machine (like up time and website log).   Thanks in advance Vikas Agarwal

Re: [LARTC] htb and bridge

2003-02-20 Thread deepak singhal
You Should Make the policies for eth0 and eth1. Deepak Singhal - Original Message - From: asko askeltaja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 09:33:44 +0200 (EET) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [LARTC] htb and bridge > Hi, > > internet -- router eth0(linu

[LARTC] shaping combined traffic ?

2003-02-20 Thread raptor
I have the following question. Is there a way to shape fairly trought one big channel two others, what I have in mind. users < [eth2]<==[eth0]<-- Internet (1Mbit/s) |[eth1]<-- Peering (1Mbit/s) Now the problem, as u see there is two

[LARTC] [tcng] example

2003-02-20 Thread raptor
hi, i would like to use just one interface to shape/police traffic, lets have following config : users -[eth1]===[eth0]-- Internet what I think to do is : $m1 = SLB(cir 20kbps, cbs 10kB); dev eth1 { ingress{ class(<$i1>) if ip_dst = 192.168.0.5 && SLB_else_drop($m1);